List your tool
Freemium

Kite

AI-powered code autocomplete for Python and other languages (discontinued)

2.9 CodingProductivity
2.9 Fair 2.9
Fast, low-friction completions that worked inside the editors developers already used The product has been discontinued, so it receives no updates or support
Reviewed by Challenging Voice Editorial · Updated Oct 2026 How we rate
PricingFree
Free planYes
CompanyKite
PlatformsMac, Windows
CategoryCoding
Founded2014
Last reviewedOct 2026

Is this your tool?

  • Claim this listing. Sign in with an email at your domain to manage it. Claim Kite
  • Get into the top 5 of Coding. 5 of 5 spots open, from $159/month. See positions
  • Something out of date? Owners can request edits from My listings; anyone can tell us.
Ask AI about Kite ChatGPT Claude Perplexity

Overview

Kite was an AI code autocomplete tool that suggested lines of code inside your editor, with Python as its strongest language. The company shut the product down, so Kite is no longer a tool you can adopt.

If you landed here wondering whether Kite still works, the short answer is no. What follows covers what it did, why it matters as history, and how to pick a replacement.

What Kite Did

Kite was a coding assistant that predicted what a developer would type next and offered it as an inline suggestion. It ran as a plugin for popular editors rather than as a standalone app.

Its pitch was speed. You wrote less boilerplate, looked up fewer function signatures, and stayed in the editor.

Kite arrived years before chat-style coding assistants became common. That makes it an early example of the category, not a competitor to the current crop.

How Kite Worked

Kite combined an editor plugin with machine learning models trained on open-source code. As you typed, the plugin used the surrounding code as context for the model, and a ranked suggestion appeared in the completion list. For details on the models and what data left the machine, check the company's own published documentation.

Diagram of the parts of Kite's AI code autocomplete: editor plugin, model, inline suggestion and local engine

A local processing option mattered to some teams. Running completions on your own machine meant less code leaving it. Which plans included it varied, so check the company's own documentation for specifics.

Kite also surfaced documentation next to the code you were writing. That saved a browser tab, though it wasn't a conversation. You couldn't ask it to refactor a file or explain an error.

Why Kite Closed

Kite's team ended the product and published their reasoning on their own site. Check that announcement for the exact wording rather than relying on summaries, including this one.

The wider context is easy to see. Large language models made general-purpose assistants far more capable, and big vendors bundled them into the editors developers already used. A focused autocomplete product faced a very different market by the end.

Who Should Look at Kite Today

Almost no one should install Kite now. Unmaintained editor plugins break when editors update, and a closed service can't fix security issues.

Two readers still have a reason to care:

  • Researchers and students studying how early ML autocomplete was built, especially if parts of the code were open-sourced. Check the company's official announcement or its public code repositories to see what is available.
  • Teams migrating off it who need to know which features to replace.

For everyone else, pick a current assistant. Choose by workflow: inline completion if you want what Kite gave you, chat and agent features if you want help beyond the next line. GitHub Copilot, Tabnine and Codeium were common names in the same space, but confirm each one's current plans, pricing and status on its official site before committing.

Browse the Coding category hub to compare active AI coding tools side by side, and weigh data handling first if your code is sensitive.

Key features

  • Line-of-code completions powered by machine learning models trained on open-source code
  • Python-first support, with other popular languages added over time
  • Plugins for several popular code editors
  • Local processing option so completions could run on the developer's machine
  • Inline documentation lookup next to the code being written

Pricing

Kite offers a free plan, with paid upgrades for higher limits and more features.

  • Pricing modelFreemium
  • Starting priceFree
  • Free planYes
Visit Kite

Pricing is provided as a guide. Check the official site for the latest plans.

Is Kite expensive?

Kite has no advertised paid tier. Among the 100 priced tools we list in Coding, the median entry price is $20 a month.

64% of Coding tools in the directory offer a free tier, and this is one of them.

Compared against every priced listing in Coding, recalculated as the catalogue changes. Method and the full market breakdown are in our AI tool pricing study.

Pros & cons

Pros

  • Fast, low-friction completions that worked inside the editors developers already used
  • A free tier let individual developers try it without paying
  • Local processing appealed to developers wary of sending code to the cloud

Cons

  • The product has been discontinued, so it receives no updates or support
  • Editor plugins can break as editors update, and no one maintains them
  • Completions were narrower than today's chat-based coding assistants, with no conversational help

Frequently asked questions

What is Kite?
Kite was an AI code autocomplete tool that suggested lines of code inside your editor, with Python as its strongest language.
Is Kite free?
Yes, Kite offers a free plan. Paid plans unlock more features and higher usage limits.

Reviews

2.9 Editorial rating No reviews yet

Write a review