Contact for Pricing

QA.tech

Testing agents that read the screen like a user, so no selectors to maintain.

4.1 Coding
4.1 Very good 4.1

Bottom line: QA.tech is a strong coding tool, best known for autonomous agents testing without selectors or code access.

Nothing brittle to break when the interface changes No pricing published on any tier
Reviewed by Challenging Voice Editorial · Updated Aug 2026 How we rate
PricingContact for Pricing
Free planNo
CompanyQA.tech
PlatformsAndroid, iOS, Web
Best forCoding
Visits7
Last reviewedAug 2026
UpdatedAug 2026
Ask AI about QA.tech ChatGPT Claude Perplexity

Overview

QA.tech runs autonomous agents over an application: end-to-end, regression, PR validation and exploratory testing, on web and mobile. The agents work from what they can see rather than from selectors or code access, and tests are written by describing them in plain English in a chat.

Selectors are the reason test suites die. A framework upgrade or a redesign invalidates hundreds of them at once, the failures are all false, and the team learns to ignore red builds, which is worse than having no tests at all. An agent that reads the interface the way a person does has nothing brittle to break.

It covers React and Vue apps, mobile web, iOS and Android, plus API, email and SMS flows, integrates with GitHub for PR review, and is SOC 2 Type 2 with SSO and SAML. Pricing is not published on any of the three tiers, though a free proof of concept covering two or three critical journeys is offered. Visual agents are slower than selector-driven scripts, and a 529 percent ROI claim is the vendor’s own arithmetic.

Key features

  • Autonomous agents testing without selectors or code access
  • Test creation by chat in plain English
  • GitHub PR integration with automated review
  • Web, mobile web, iOS and Android coverage
  • API, email and SMS testing

Screenshots & demo

QA.tech screenshot 1

Pricing

QA.tech uses custom pricing. Contact their team for a quote based on your needs.

  • Pricing modelContact for Pricing
  • Starting priceCustom
  • Free planNo
Visit QA.tech

Pricing is provided as a guide. Check the official site for the latest plans.

Pros & cons

Pros

  • Nothing brittle to break when the interface changes
  • Free proof of concept before committing
  • SOC 2 Type 2 with SSO and SAML

Cons

  • No pricing published on any tier
  • Visual agents run slower than selector-driven scripts
  • The 529 percent ROI figure is the vendor's own arithmetic

How it compares

ToolRatingFreeFromBest known for
QA.tech (this tool)4.1NoAutonomous agents testing without selectors or code access
Cursor4.7Yes$20/moMulti-line Tab autocomplete predicting full edits
Claude Code4.6No$20/moTerminal-native agent with direct codebase and shell access
GitHub Copilot4.6Yes$10/moOriginal AI coding autocomplete, launched in 2021

Our verdict

4.1 / 5 4.1

QA.tech is a strong coding tool, best known for autonomous agents testing without selectors or code access.

What makes it different: QA.tech stands out for autonomous agents testing without selectors or code access.

How we score it
Overall 4.1
Value for money 4.2
Feature depth 4.9
Popularity 3.7
Best for DevelopersEngineering teamsStudentsIndie hackers

Frequently asked questions

What is QA.tech?
QA.tech is a coding tool listed in the Challenging Voice directory. Testing agents that read the screen like a user, so no selectors to maintain.
Is QA.tech free?
QA.tech does not offer a free plan.
What are the best QA.tech alternatives?
Popular alternatives to QA.tech include Zoer, HeyBoss AI, and LAUNCHED. Browse them all in the Coding category.
Is QA.tech any good?
QA.tech scores 4.1 out of 5 based on our editorial review.

Reviews

4.1 No reviews yet

Write a review

Similar tools you might like

Nimbalyst

4.0

Open-source visual workspace for Claude Code and Codex that adds diagrams, mockups, and a session manager to terminal-based coding agents.

Free Coding