List your tool

Head to head · 2026

Amazon Q Developer vs Sourcegraph Cody

Pricing, free plans, ratings, features, pros and cons, side by side. Where one comes out ahead, we mark it.

Amazon Q Developer

AWS's assistant, built around AWS-specific code and infrastructure

4.4$19/mo

Visit Amazon Q Developer (opens Amazon Q Developer in a new tab)

Sourcegraph Cody

Sourcegraph's established chat-and-autocomplete assistant, not its newer agent

4.2Not listed

Visit Sourcegraph Cody (opens Sourcegraph Cody in a new tab)

Who comes out ahead

Based only on the facts in our directory. The right pick still depends on the job you need done.

  • Lower starting price

    Not comparable

    Not comparable: Sourcegraph Cody does not list a price

  • Free plan

    Amazon Q Developer

    Only Amazon Q Developer has one

  • Higher rating

    Amazon Q Developer

    4.4 against 4.2

  • Same job?

    Yes

    Both are Coding tools

Side by side

Compared onAmazon Q DeveloperSourcegraph Cody
Our rating4.4Better4.2
Starts at$19/moNot listed
Free planYesBetterNo
CategoryCodingCoding
Plans
  • Free$0
  • Pro$19 per user/mo
See pricing
Key features
  • Deep understanding of AWS services and infrastructure code
  • Built-in security vulnerability scanning
  • Automated large-scale code transformations (like Java upgrades)
  • Free tier for individual developers
  • Enterprise administration and compliance features
  • Chat and code completion grounded in Sourcegraph's code search
  • Distinct from Sourcegraph's newer, more autonomous Amp product
  • Understanding spans an entire repository or organization's codebase
  • IDE extensions for major editors
  • No free tier
Pros
  • Genuine depth on AWS-specific code and services
  • Security scanning built into the core workflow, not a separate tool
  • Automated transformation features handle tedious large-scale upgrades
  • Grounded in genuinely mature, enterprise-tested code search technology
  • Interactive chat model suits developers who want to stay closely involved
  • Understands code context across a whole codebase, not just open files
Cons
  • AWS-specific strength matters less for teams on other cloud providers
  • Per-user pricing adds up for larger teams
  • Less general-purpose polish than editor-native competitors
  • No free tier to test before committing
  • Overlaps with Sourcegraph's own newer Amp product, worth comparing both directly
  • Less autonomous than newer agent-first competitors by design
CompanyAmazon Web Services, founded 2023Sourcegraph, founded 2013

Prices come from each vendor's pricing page, last checked 20260629. Check the vendor before you buy.

FAQ

Questions people ask

Is Amazon Q Developer better than Sourcegraph Cody?

In our reviews Amazon Q Developer scores 4.4 and Sourcegraph Cody scores 4.2. The better pick depends on the job. Amazon Q Developer: AWS's assistant, built around AWS-specific code and infrastructure. Sourcegraph Cody: Sourcegraph's established chat-and-autocomplete assistant, not its newer agent.

Which is cheaper, Amazon Q Developer or Sourcegraph Cody?

Amazon Q Developer: from $19/mo. Sourcegraph Cody: see pricing.

Do Amazon Q Developer and Sourcegraph Cody have free plans?

Only Amazon Q Developer has a free plan.

More comparisons