List your tool

Head to head · 2026

Augment Code vs Sourcegraph Cody

Pricing, free plans, ratings, features, pros and cons, side by side. Where one comes out ahead, we mark it.

Augment Code

Built around indexing an entire large enterprise codebase

4.3$20/mo

Visit Augment Code (opens Augment Code in a new tab)

Sourcegraph Cody

Sourcegraph's established chat-and-autocomplete assistant, not its newer agent

4.2Not listed

Visit Sourcegraph Cody (opens Sourcegraph Cody in a new tab)

Who comes out ahead

Based only on the facts in our directory. The right pick still depends on the job you need done.

  • Lower starting price

    Not comparable

    Not comparable: Sourcegraph Cody does not list a price

  • Free plan

    Augment Code

    Only Augment Code has one

  • Higher rating

    Augment Code

    4.3 against 4.2

  • Same job?

    Yes

    Both are Coding tools

Side by side

Compared onAugment CodeSourcegraph Cody
Our rating4.3Better4.2
Starts at$20/moNot listed
Free planYesBetterNo
CategoryCodingCoding
Plans
  • Free$0 to start
  • Standard$20/mo flat, no per-seat charge
  • Business$100/mo flat, no per-seat charge
  • EnterpriseQuote only
See pricing
Key features
  • Context engine indexing an entire large codebase
  • Integrates into existing IDEs rather than requiring a switch
  • Built for large-scale enterprise engineering teams
  • Full-repository awareness beyond open files
  • Significant venture backing supporting ongoing development
  • Chat and code completion grounded in Sourcegraph's code search
  • Distinct from Sourcegraph's newer, more autonomous Amp product
  • Understanding spans an entire repository or organization's codebase
  • IDE extensions for major editors
  • No free tier
Pros
  • Full-codebase context suits genuinely large, complex engineering projects
  • Integrates into existing IDE setups rather than forcing a switch
  • Backed by substantial funding supporting continued development
  • Grounded in genuinely mature, enterprise-tested code search technology
  • Interactive chat model suits developers who want to stay closely involved
  • Understands code context across a whole codebase, not just open files
Cons
  • No free tier to test before committing
  • Full value depends on working in a codebase large enough to benefit
  • Per-user pricing scales significantly for larger teams
  • No free tier to test before committing
  • Overlaps with Sourcegraph's own newer Amp product, worth comparing both directly
  • Less autonomous than newer agent-first competitors by design
CompanyAugment Code, founded 2022Sourcegraph, founded 2013

Prices come from each vendor's pricing page, last checked 20260629. Check the vendor before you buy.

FAQ

Questions people ask

Is Augment Code better than Sourcegraph Cody?

In our reviews Augment Code scores 4.3 and Sourcegraph Cody scores 4.2. The better pick depends on the job. Augment Code: Built around indexing an entire large enterprise codebase. Sourcegraph Cody: Sourcegraph's established chat-and-autocomplete assistant, not its newer agent.

Which is cheaper, Augment Code or Sourcegraph Cody?

Augment Code: from $20/mo. Sourcegraph Cody: see pricing.

Do Augment Code and Sourcegraph Cody have free plans?

Only Augment Code has a free plan.

More comparisons