List your tool

Head to head · 2026

Autosana vs QA.tech

Pricing, free plans, ratings, features, pros and cons, side by side. Where one comes out ahead, we mark it.

Autosana

An agentic QA platform runs and self-heals end-to-end tests across iOS, Android, and web apps without…

3.9$500/mo

Visit Autosana (opens Autosana in a new tab)

QA.tech

Testing agents that read the screen like a user, so no selectors to maintain

4.1Not listed

Visit QA.tech (opens QA.tech in a new tab)

Who comes out ahead

Based only on the facts in our directory. The right pick still depends on the job you need done.

  • Lower starting price

    Not comparable

    Not comparable: QA.tech does not list a price

  • Free plan

    Tie

    Neither has one

  • Higher rating

    QA.tech

    3.9 against 4.1

  • Same job?

    Yes

    Both are Coding tools

Side by side

Compared onAutosanaQA.tech
Our rating3.94.1Better
Starts at$500/moNot listed
Free planNoNo
CategoryCodingCoding
PlansFrom $500/moSee pricing
Key features
  • Natural-language test creation, describe a flow, the agent runs it like a real user
  • Self-healing tests that adapt automatically when UI elements move or change
  • Cross-platform coverage across iOS, Android, Flutter, React Native, Swift, and Kotlin
  • Local loop with a team's coding agent until every test passes before merge
  • Cloud-agent PR checks that attach video proof of a feature working end to end
  • Autonomous agents testing without selectors or code access
  • Test creation by chat in plain English
  • GitHub PR integration with automated review
  • Web, mobile web, iOS and Android coverage
  • API, email and SMS testing
Pros
  • Self-healing tests cut the maintenance burden that normally accumulates with scripted UI tests
  • Video proof attached to PRs gives reviewers evidence beyond a pass/fail status check
  • Already validated at scale, QA for apps serving 100M+ daily active users
  • Nothing brittle to break when the interface changes
  • Free proof of concept before committing
  • SOC 2 Type 2 with SSO and SAML
Cons
  • No free trial, the $500/month entry price is a real commitment before testing fit
  • Founded mid-2025, so long-term reliability data is still limited
  • Entry price puts it out of reach for solo developers or pre-revenue startups
  • No pricing published on any tier
  • Visual agents run slower than selector-driven scripts
  • The 529 percent ROI figure is the vendor's own arithmetic
CompanyAutosana, founded 2025QA.tech

Prices come from each vendor's pricing page, last checked 20260814. Check the vendor before you buy.

FAQ

Questions people ask

Is Autosana better than QA.tech?

In our reviews Autosana scores 3.9 and QA.tech scores 4.1. The better pick depends on the job. Autosana: An agentic QA platform runs and self-heals end-to-end tests across iOS, Android, and web apps without scripting. QA.tech: Testing agents that read the screen like a user, so no selectors to maintain.

Which is cheaper, Autosana or QA.tech?

Autosana: from $500/mo. QA.tech: see pricing.

Do Autosana and QA.tech have free plans?

Neither lists a free plan.

More comparisons