List your tool

Head to head · 2026

Cerebras vs Groq

Pricing, free plans, ratings, features, pros and cons, side by side. Where one comes out ahead, we mark it.

Cerebras

Wafer-scale AI chips that run inference faster than GPU-based clouds on public benchmarks

4.2Not listed

Visit Cerebras (opens Cerebras in a new tab)

Groq

Custom LPU chips built by a former Google TPU architect for near-instant AI inference

4.3Free

Visit Groq (opens Groq in a new tab)

Who comes out ahead

Based only on the facts in our directory. The right pick still depends on the job you need done.

  • Lower starting price

    Not comparable

    Not comparable: Cerebras does not list a price

  • Free plan

    Groq

    Only Groq has one

  • Higher rating

    Groq

    4.2 against 4.3

  • Same job?

    Yes

    Both are AI Infrastructure & Agent Tooling tools

Side by side

Compared onCerebrasGroq
Our rating4.24.3Better
Starts atNot listedFree
Free planNoYesBetter
CategoryAI Infrastructure & Agent ToolingAI Infrastructure & Agent Tooling
PlansSee pricingFree
Key features
  • Wafer-Scale Engine: a single large chip built specifically for AI workloads
  • Cloud inference service running on Cerebras hardware, priced per million tokens
  • Independently benchmarked inference speeds ahead of GPU-based providers on several open models
  • CS-3 systems available for on-premises deployment at enterprise scale
  • Supports popular open-weight models including Llama variants
  • Custom LPU chips designed specifically for large language model inference
  • GroqCloud free developer tier alongside usage-based production pricing
  • Consistently ranks among the fastest publicly benchmarked inference speeds
  • Founded by Jonathan Ross, a former lead architect of Google's TPU
  • Popular backend choice for real-time voice AI and chat applications
Pros
  • Benchmarked inference speed is a genuine, independently verified differentiator
  • Per-million-token cloud pricing lowers the barrier versus buying CS-3 hardware outright
  • Strong fit for latency-sensitive production applications
  • Free developer tier makes it easy to benchmark speed before committing to production traffic
  • Inference speed is independently verified, not just a marketing claim
  • Strong fit for real-time, latency-sensitive applications like voice agents
Cons
  • CS-3 hardware itself is a multi-million-dollar purchase, out of reach for most teams
  • Model selection on the cloud service is narrower than general-purpose GPU clouds
  • Newer entrant competing against far larger, more established cloud providers
  • Model selection is narrower than general-purpose inference providers running any open weight
  • Usage-based token pricing needs monitoring at high production volumes
  • Custom hardware means Groq depends on its own chip roadmap rather than commodity GPU supply
CompanyCerebras Systems, founded 2015Groq, founded 2016

Prices come from each vendor's pricing page, last checked 20260716. Check the vendor before you buy.

FAQ

Questions people ask

Is Cerebras better than Groq?

In our reviews Cerebras scores 4.2 and Groq scores 4.3. The better pick depends on the job. Cerebras: Wafer-scale AI chips that run inference faster than GPU-based clouds on public benchmarks. Groq: Custom LPU chips built by a former Google TPU architect for near-instant AI inference.

Which is cheaper, Cerebras or Groq?

Cerebras: see pricing. Groq: free.

Do Cerebras and Groq have free plans?

Only Groq has a free plan.

More comparisons