List your tool

Head to head · 2026

Claude Code vs Sourcegraph Cody

Pricing, free plans, ratings, features, pros and cons, side by side. Where one comes out ahead, we mark it.

Claude Code

Anthropic's agentic CLI tool for real software development work

4.6$20/mo

Visit Claude Code (opens Claude Code in a new tab)

Sourcegraph Cody

Sourcegraph's established chat-and-autocomplete assistant, not its newer agent

4.2Not listed

Visit Sourcegraph Cody (opens Sourcegraph Cody in a new tab)

Who comes out ahead

Based only on the facts in our directory. The right pick still depends on the job you need done.

  • Lower starting price

    Not comparable

    Not comparable: Sourcegraph Cody does not list a price

  • Free plan

    Tie

    Neither has one

  • Higher rating

    Claude Code

    4.6 against 4.2

  • Same job?

    Yes

    Both are Coding tools

Side by side

Compared onClaude CodeSourcegraph Cody
Our rating4.6Better4.2
Starts at$20/moNot listed
Free planNoNo
CategoryCodingCoding
Plans
  • Pro$20/mo
  • Max$100/mo
See pricing
Key features
  • Terminal-native agent with direct codebase and shell access
  • Multi-file, coordinated code changes in one session
  • Runs tests and reads output as part of task completion
  • Git-aware, can commit and manage version control directly
  • Configurable permission levels for autonomous actions
  • Chat and code completion grounded in Sourcegraph's code search
  • Distinct from Sourcegraph's newer, more autonomous Amp product
  • Understanding spans an entire repository or organization's codebase
  • IDE extensions for major editors
  • No free tier
Pros
  • Direct shell and codebase access supports genuinely complex, multi-step tasks
  • Can verify its own work by actually running tests and reading results
  • Git integration keeps changes properly tracked
  • Grounded in genuinely mature, enterprise-tested code search technology
  • Interactive chat model suits developers who want to stay closely involved
  • Understands code context across a whole codebase, not just open files
Cons
  • No free tier, requires a paid Claude subscription or API access
  • Terminal-based workflow has a learning curve for developers used to GUI tools
  • Broader task scope means reviewing larger, multi-file changes takes real attention
  • No free tier to test before committing
  • Overlaps with Sourcegraph's own newer Amp product, worth comparing both directly
  • Less autonomous than newer agent-first competitors by design
CompanyAnthropic, founded 2025Sourcegraph, founded 2013

Prices come from each vendor's pricing page, last checked 20260703. Check the vendor before you buy.

FAQ

Questions people ask

Is Claude Code better than Sourcegraph Cody?

In our reviews Claude Code scores 4.6 and Sourcegraph Cody scores 4.2. The better pick depends on the job. Claude Code: Anthropic's agentic CLI tool for real software development work. Sourcegraph Cody: Sourcegraph's established chat-and-autocomplete assistant, not its newer agent.

Which is cheaper, Claude Code or Sourcegraph Cody?

Claude Code: from $20/mo. Sourcegraph Cody: see pricing.

Do Claude Code and Sourcegraph Cody have free plans?

Neither lists a free plan.

More comparisons