List your tool

Head to head · 2026

Darrow vs Harvey

Pricing, free plans, ratings, features, pros and cons, side by side. Where one comes out ahead, we mark it.

Darrow

AI legal intelligence platform that scans public records to surface class-action and mass-tort opportunities

3.9Not listed

Visit Darrow (opens Darrow in a new tab)

Harvey

Backed by OpenAI's own startup fund, reaching an $11 billion valuation in 3 years

4.4$333/mo

Visit Harvey (opens Harvey in a new tab)

Who comes out ahead

Based only on the facts in our directory. The right pick still depends on the job you need done.

  • Lower starting price

    Not comparable

    Not comparable: Darrow does not list a price

  • Free plan

    Tie

    Neither has one

  • Higher rating

    Harvey

    3.9 against 4.4

  • Same job?

    Yes

    Both are Legal AI tools

Side by side

Compared onDarrowHarvey
Our rating3.94.4Better
Starts atNot listed$333/mo
Free planNoNo
CategoryLegal AILegal AI
PlansSee pricingFrom $333/mo
Key features
  • Scans and clusters public records to surface class-action and mass-tort opportunities
  • In-house legal experts review findings for accuracy before cases reach attorneys
  • Portfolio-management platform for tracking litigation like an investment fund
  • Facilitated over $18 billion in identified litigation opportunities over five years
  • Combined subscription and usage-based pricing scaled to case and scan volume
  • Document review, due diligence, contract analysis, and legal research in one platform
  • Built specifically for large law firms and corporate legal departments
  • $1B+ raised, $11B valuation, ~$190M ARR as of March 2026
  • Backed by Sequoia Capital, Google Ventures, and OpenAI's startup fund
  • Enterprise subscription with custom pricing per firm
Pros
  • Systematic public-records scanning surfaces case opportunities referrals alone would miss
  • In-house legal expert review adds a real accuracy check before cases move forward
  • Portfolio-management tools bring investment-style discipline to litigation strategy
  • Purpose-built for the specific demands of large-firm legal work
  • Exceptionally strong investor backing signals long-term product investment
  • Rapid revenue growth validates real adoption inside major firms
Cons
  • Revenue-sharing on some engagements raises ethical questions some lawyers flag
  • Pricing model combining subscription, usage, and award-sharing is less transparent than a flat rate
  • Built specifically for plaintiffs' firms pursuing class and mass actions, not general practice
  • Enterprise pricing starts around $40,000 a year, out of reach for small firms
  • Per-user unlimited plans running $500-$1,500 a month add up quickly at scale
  • Built for large-firm workflows, less suited to a solo practitioner or small practice
CompanyDarrow, founded 2020Harvey, founded 2022

Prices come from each vendor's pricing page, last checked 20260716. Check the vendor before you buy.

FAQ

Questions people ask

Is Darrow better than Harvey?

In our reviews Darrow scores 3.9 and Harvey scores 4.4. The better pick depends on the job. Darrow: AI legal intelligence platform that scans public records to surface class-action and mass-tort opportunities. Harvey: Backed by OpenAI's own startup fund, reaching an $11 billion valuation in 3 years.

Which is cheaper, Darrow or Harvey?

Darrow: see pricing. Harvey: from $333/mo.

Do Darrow and Harvey have free plans?

Neither lists a free plan.

More comparisons