Automates evidence collection for SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, and similar frameworks
Continuous monitoring connects directly to existing cloud, HR, and identity systems
Pricing starts around $7,500 a year with tiers scaling to enterprise
$79M raised total within two years of its 2020 launch
Backed by Kleiner Perkins, Gradient Ventures, and Kaiser Permanente
Pros
Generally lower estimated pricing than Vanta at comparable company sizes
Deeper evidence control suits maturing, multi-framework security programs
Structured support model fits organizations past their first audit
Removes manual evidence-collection work through continuous system monitoring
Supports multiple compliance frameworks on one platform as needs grow
Backed by investors with genuine healthcare-industry compliance expertise
Cons
Pricing still requires a sales conversation for an exact quote
Less optimized for the fastest-possible single-framework first audit than Vanta
Deeper control and structure add complexity a very early-stage team may not need yet
Enterprise-tier pricing can reach $60,000 to $100,000-plus a year at scale
Competes directly with well-established players like Vanta and Drata in a crowded category
Requires integration across a company's full tech stack to deliver full value
Company
Drata, founded 2020
Secureframe, founded 2020
Prices come from each vendor's pricing page, last checked 2026-09-24. Check the vendor before you buy.
FAQ
Questions people ask
Is Drata better than Secureframe?
In our reviews Drata scores 4.3 and Secureframe scores 4.1. The better pick depends on the job. Drata: Built for scaling teams managing several compliance frameworks at once. Secureframe: Compliance automation starting around $7,500 a year, scaling to enterprise contracts.
Drata
Secureframe
