List your tool

Head to head · 2026

Fetcher vs Humanly

Pricing, free plans, ratings, features, pros and cons, side by side. Where one comes out ahead, we mark it.

Fetcher

Pulls qualified candidates from a database of 500 million global profiles

4.1$99/mo

Visit Fetcher (opens Fetcher in a new tab)

Humanly

Combines an AI Recruiter, AI Interviewer, and ATS after a $25M round focused on candidate experience

4.0Not listed

Visit Humanly (opens Humanly in a new tab)

Who comes out ahead

Based only on the facts in our directory. The right pick still depends on the job you need done.

  • Lower starting price

    Not comparable

    Not comparable: Humanly does not list a price

  • Free plan

    Tie

    Neither has one

  • Higher rating

    Fetcher

    4.1 against 4.0

  • Same job?

    Yes

    Both are HR & Recruiting AI tools

Side by side

Compared onFetcherHumanly
Our rating4.1Better4.0
Starts at$99/moNot listed
Free planNoNo
CategoryHR & Recruiting AIHR & Recruiting AI
Plans
  • Self-serve$115/mo
  • Growth$379/mo
  • Amplify$649/mo
See pricing
Key features
  • Sources from a proprietary database of 500 million-plus global profiles
  • Integrates directly with existing ATS and email clients
  • Optional managed sourcing where Fetcher's team runs searches directly
  • Originally launched in 2014, pivoted from professional networking to AI sourcing
  • $40M total funding including a $27M Series B
  • AI Recruiter, AI Interviewer, and ATS combined in one platform
  • Conversational AI across chat, phone, and video for candidate engagement
  • Built specifically for high-volume hiring scenarios
  • $25M Series B in May 2026 led by SEEK Investments, $52M raised total
  • Outcome-based pricing options including pay-per-candidate and pay-per-hire
Pros
  • Large proprietary candidate database reduces manual sourcing work
  • Managed sourcing option available for harder-to-fill roles without extra headcount
  • More accessible entry pricing than several enterprise-only competitors
  • Combines recruiting, interviewing, and tracking rather than requiring separate tools
  • Outcome-based pricing options align cost directly with hiring results
  • Backed by SEEK, a company with direct recruiting-industry expertise
Cons
  • Managed sourcing adds meaningful cost on top of the base subscription
  • Sourcing-focused scope doesn't cover interviewing or assessment directly
  • Database breadth matters less for highly specialized or niche technical roles
  • Pricing isn't published, requires a demo and custom quote
  • Reported mid-market deployments run $15,000 to $50,000-plus annually
  • Best suited to high-volume hiring, less differentiated for low-volume, senior roles
CompanyFetcher, founded 2014Humanly, founded 2018

Prices come from each vendor's pricing page, last checked 20260715. Check the vendor before you buy.

FAQ

Questions people ask

Is Fetcher better than Humanly?

In our reviews Fetcher scores 4.1 and Humanly scores 4.0. The better pick depends on the job. Fetcher: Pulls qualified candidates from a database of 500 million global profiles. Humanly: Combines an AI Recruiter, AI Interviewer, and ATS after a $25M round focused on candidate experience.

Which is cheaper, Fetcher or Humanly?

Fetcher: from $99/mo. Humanly: see pricing.

Do Fetcher and Humanly have free plans?

Neither lists a free plan.

More comparisons