Humanly vs Interviewer.AI (2026): Pricing, Features & Which to Choose

Who comes out ahead

Based only on the facts in our directory. The right pick still depends on the job you need done.

Lower starting price
Not comparable
Not comparable: Humanly does not list a price
Free plan
Tie
Neither has one
Higher rating
Humanly
4.0 against 3.9
Same job?
Yes
Both are HR & Recruiting AI tools

Side by side

Compared on	Humanly	Interviewer.AI
Our rating	4.0Better	3.9
Starts at	Not listed	Not listed
Free plan	No	No
Category	HR & Recruiting AI	HR & Recruiting AI
Plans	See pricing	See pricing
Key features	AI Recruiter, AI Interviewer, and ATS combined in one platform Conversational AI across chat, phone, and video for candidate engagement Built specifically for high-volume hiring scenarios $25M Series B in May 2026 led by SEEK Investments, $52M raised total Outcome-based pricing options including pay-per-candidate and pay-per-hire	Structured video interview scoring against defined hiring competencies Asynchronous candidate recording that removes live-interview scheduling Ranked shortlist and per-candidate scorecards for recruiting teams Built for high-volume first-round screening rather than final-round interviews Used across campus recruiting, call center, and volume-hiring scenarios
Pros	Combines recruiting, interviewing, and tracking rather than requiring separate tools Outcome-based pricing options align cost directly with hiring results Backed by SEEK, a company with direct recruiting-industry expertise	Established track record dating back to 2018, not a recent entrant Removes scheduling friction from first-round interviews entirely Structured scoring reduces reliance on resume keyword matching
Cons	Pricing isn't published, requires a demo and custom quote Reported mid-market deployments run $15,000 to $50,000-plus annually Best suited to high-volume hiring, less differentiated for low-volume, senior roles	No public pricing; quotes require a sales conversation Asynchronous video screening is not the right fit for low-volume hiring Candidates unfamiliar with recorded interviews may perform worse than in a live conversation
Company	Humanly, founded 2018	Interviewer.AI, founded 2018

Prices come from each vendor's pricing page, last checked 20260730. Check the vendor before you buy.

FAQ

Questions people ask

Is Humanly better than Interviewer.AI?

In our reviews Humanly scores 4.0 and Interviewer.AI scores 3.9. The better pick depends on the job. Humanly: Combines an AI Recruiter, AI Interviewer, and ATS after a $25M round focused on candidate experience. Interviewer.AI: Automates first-round video interviews by scoring recorded candidate responses against structured hiring criteria.

Which is cheaper, Humanly or Interviewer.AI?

Humanly: see pricing. Interviewer.AI: see pricing.

Do Humanly and Interviewer.AI have free plans?

Neither lists a free plan.

More comparisons

Humanly compared with

All Humanly alternatives

Interviewer.AI compared with

All Interviewer.AI alternatives