List your tool

Head to head · 2026

Inngest vs MuleRun

Pricing, free plans, ratings, features, pros and cons, side by side. Where one comes out ahead, we mark it.

Inngest

Inngest gives developers durable execution and event-driven workflow orchestration without managing queues or infrastructure

4.3$99/mo

Visit Inngest (opens Inngest in a new tab)

MuleRun

Agents that live on their own always-on computers rather than in a chat window

3.9Free

Visit MuleRun (opens MuleRun in a new tab)

Who comes out ahead

Based only on the facts in our directory. The right pick still depends on the job you need done.

  • Lower starting price

    Not comparable

    Not comparable: MuleRun does not list a price

  • Free plan

    Tie

    Both have one

  • Higher rating

    Inngest

    4.3 against 3.9

  • Same job?

    Yes

    Both are AI Infrastructure & Agent Tooling tools

Side by side

Compared onInngestMuleRun
Our rating4.3Better3.9
Starts at$99/moFree
Free planYesYes
CategoryAI Infrastructure & Agent ToolingAI Infrastructure & Agent Tooling
Plans
  • Free$0
  • ProFrom $99/mo
  • BusinessFrom $499/mo
  • EnterpriseQuote only
Free
Key features
  • Durable step functions with automatic retries and state persistence
  • Event-driven triggers for background jobs and scheduled functions
  • Open-core architecture runnable locally or on Inngest Cloud
  • Built-in tracing, metrics, and alerting for production workflows
  • Runs on serverless, dedicated servers, or edge compute
  • Agents running on dedicated persistent computers
  • Always-on operation with no prompting required
  • Multi-step workflows using real tools
  • Self-evolving workforce learning across the platform
  • Proactive monitoring that acts before alerts
Pros
  • Free Hobby tier with no credit card required lowers the barrier to first use
  • Open-core model lets teams self-host or run locally during development
  • Backed by credible venture investors (GGV Capital, Afore Capital)
  • Persistence enables work that has to happen while nobody is watching
  • Agents operate real tools rather than describing what to do
  • Free account before any commitment
Cons
  • Pro plan jumps to $99/month, a real step up from the free tier for growing usage
  • Value is confined to engineering teams -- no utility for non-technical users
  • Competes in a crowded workflow-orchestration space against Temporal, AWS Step Functions, and others
  • No pricing published on the homepage
  • An always-on agent accrues cost whether or not it achieves anything
  • Cross-customer pattern learning is worth checking before sensitive work
CompanyInngest, founded 2021MuleRun

Prices come from each vendor's pricing page, last checked 20260818. Check the vendor before you buy.

FAQ

Questions people ask

Is Inngest better than MuleRun?

In our reviews Inngest scores 4.3 and MuleRun scores 3.9. The better pick depends on the job. Inngest: Inngest gives developers durable execution and event-driven workflow orchestration without managing queues or infrastructure. MuleRun: Agents that live on their own always-on computers rather than in a chat window.

Which is cheaper, Inngest or MuleRun?

Inngest: from $99/mo. MuleRun: free.

Do Inngest and MuleRun have free plans?

Yes, both have a free plan.

More comparisons

Inngest compared with

All Inngest alternatives

MuleRun compared with

All MuleRun alternatives