Shortlist by what you need
Start here if you know why you are leaving QualGent.
Want the closest match?
TestsigmaMost similar to QualGent in what it does, its category and its price.
Visit (opens Testsigma in a new tab)Need a free plan?
KushoAIHas a free plan, rated 4.0 out of 5. QualGent has none.
Visit (opens KushoAI in a new tab)Want the lowest price?
BugsterFrom $20/mo, the lowest starting price here.
Visit (opens Bugster in a new tab)Want the best rated?
QA.techRated 4.1 out of 5 in our review, against 3.9 for QualGent.
Visit (opens QA.tech in a new tab)
At a glance
Green means better than QualGent, red means worse. Prices are starting prices per month.
| Tool | Our rating | Starts at | Free plan | Best for | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 QualGentBaseline | 3.9 | Not listed | No | Agentic mobile QA that replaces flaky test suites with deterministic autonomous testing. | |
| Testsigma | 4.0+0.1 | Free | YesQualGent has none | Agentic test automation that generates, runs, heals and diagnoses tests | vs QualGent |
| QA.tech | 4.1+0.2 | Not listed | No | Testing agents that read the screen like a user, so no selectors to maintain. | vs QualGent |
| Bugster | 3.9Same | $20/mo | YesQualGent has none | Watches user flows in a live application and regenerates end-to-end tests automatically when the UI changes. | vs QualGent |
 Pie | 4.1+0.2 | Not listed | No | Reads your pull request, tests the app like a user would, and opens a PR with the fix. | vs QualGent |
 Roost.ai | 3.6−0.3 | Not listed | No | Generates unit, API and UI test cases, and spins up ephemeral preview environments to run them in. | vs QualGent |
| KushoAI | 4.0+0.1 | Free | YesQualGent has none | An AI agent that generates and maintains API test suites from OpenAPI, Swagger, or Postman specs without hand-written tests. | vs QualGent |
 Drizz | 4.0+0.1 | Not listed | No | Vision-AI mobile app testing agent that writes, runs, and self-heals iOS and Android tests from plain-English descriptions. | vs QualGent |
 Kobiton | 3.9Same | Not listed | No | Mobile app testing on real devices, with a device cloud, AI-augmented testing, no-code validations and DevOps pipeline integration. | vs QualGent |
The alternatives in detail
In order of how closely each one matches QualGent.
Testsigma
4.0Free
vs QualGent+0.1Free plan
Agentic test automation that generates, runs, heals and diagnoses tests.
- Test generation from written requirements
- Self-healing tests when the interface changes
- Automated failure diagnosis
Self-healing addresses the maintenance load that kills test suites
Generated tests need review against real acceptance criteria
QA.tech
4.1Not listed
vs QualGent+0.2
Testing agents that read the screen like a user, so no selectors to maintain.
- Autonomous agents testing without selectors or code access
- Test creation by chat in plain English
- GitHub PR integration with automated review
Nothing brittle to break when the interface changes
No pricing published on any tier
Bugster
3.9$20/mo
vs QualGentSameFree plan
Watches user flows in a live application and regenerates end-to-end tests automatically when the UI changes.
- Automatic end-to-end test generation from captured user flows
- Self-adapting tests when the UI changes
- Real-browser test execution on every pull request
Free tier (100 test runs/month) makes it accessible to solo developers and small teams
Founded in 2023, so its long-term reliability across large, complex codebases is less proven than established QA vendors
Pie
4.1Not listed
vs QualGent+0.2
Reads your pull request, tests the app like a user would, and opens a PR with the fix.
- Reads pull requests and tests the changed code
- Opens fix PRs instead of filing tickets
- Self-healing tests that survive UI redesigns
Self-healing avoids the maintenance cost that kills test suites
Pricing is only quoted after a scan of your app
Roost.ai
3.6Not listed
vs QualGent−0.3
Generates unit, API and UI test cases, and spins up ephemeral preview environments to run them in.
- Test case generation via RoostGPT
- Unit, API and functional UI test coverage
- LLM application testing
Environments plus generation removes the constraint that stalls testing work
Generated tests cover inferred paths, not the edge cases that break production
KushoAI
4.0Free
vs QualGent+0.1Free plan
An AI agent that generates and maintains API test suites from OpenAPI, Swagger, or Postman specs without hand-written tests.
- AI-generated test suites from OpenAPI, Swagger, or Postman specs
- Functional, edge-case, security, and load test coverage
- Continuous test maintenance as APIs change
Removes most manual effort of hand-writing API test suites
Enterprise pricing is not published, so cost planning requires a sales call
Drizz
4.0Not listed
vs QualGent+0.1
Vision-AI mobile app testing agent that writes, runs, and self-heals iOS and Android tests from plain-English descriptions.
- Plain-English test authoring without scripting
- Vision AI execution on real iOS and Android devices
- Self-healing tests that adapt to UI changes
Removes selector maintenance, a common source of flaky mobile tests
No published per-test-run price, so cost is hard to estimate upfront
Kobiton
3.9Not listed
vs QualGentSame
Mobile app testing on real devices, with a device cloud, AI-augmented testing, no-code validations and DevOps pipeline integration.
- Real-device mobile testing rather than emulators
- Mobile device cloud plus management of your own device lab
- AI-Augmented Testing
Real devices surface the fragmentation and hardware bugs emulators hide
No public pricing
FAQ
Questions people ask
Is QualGent free?
QualGent does not list a free plan. Check its pricing page for current plans.
What is the best free alternative to QualGent?
Testsigma is the highest-rated alternative here with a free plan (4.0 out of 5). Other free options: KushoAI, Bugster.
What is the cheapest alternative to QualGent?
Among paid plans, Bugster has the lowest starting price (from $20/mo). If you need it free, start with Testsigma.
How did you pick these alternatives?
We match tools on what they do, their category and their price, using the details in our directory. Ratings come from our reviews and reader reviews.