List your tool

Head to head · 2026

ActiveBatch vs Flowable

Pricing, free plans, ratings, features, pros and cons, side by side. Where one comes out ahead, we mark it.

ActiveBatch

Enterprise workload-automation platform that orchestrates job scheduling across on-prem, cloud, and hybrid systems from one console

4.1Not listed

Visit ActiveBatch (opens ActiveBatch in a new tab)

Flowable

Open-source business process automation platform for modeling, running, and monitoring enterprise workflows

4.2Free

Visit Flowable (opens Flowable in a new tab)

Who comes out ahead

Based only on the facts in our directory. The right pick still depends on the job you need done.

  • Lower starting price

    Not comparable

    Not comparable: ActiveBatch does not list a price

  • Free plan

    Flowable

    Only Flowable has one

  • Higher rating

    Flowable

    4.1 against 4.2

  • Same job?

    Yes

    Both are Automation tools

Side by side

Compared onActiveBatchFlowable
Our rating4.14.2Better
Starts atNot listedFree
Free planNoYesBetter
CategoryAutomationAutomation
PlansSee pricingFree
Key features
  • Drag-and-drop, scriptless workflow orchestration
  • REST API integrations and pre-built connectors across IT systems
  • Centralized console for job scheduling across on-prem, cloud, and hybrid environments
  • Self-Service Portal and mobile app add-ons
  • Governance and audit controls for enterprise IT compliance
  • BPMN 2.0, CMMN, and DMN engines for modeling processes, case management, and decision logic
  • Open-source Community Edition under Apache License 2.0
  • Low-code app builder for forms and task UIs
  • Agentic automation for combining AI agents with deterministic workflow steps
  • Built-in analytics and process-monitoring dashboards
Pros
  • Two-plus decades of production use across 2,000+ enterprise customers
  • Scriptless design lowers the bar for building new automated workflows
  • Backed by Redwood Software's broader automation and finance-ops portfolio since 2022
  • Built on open standards (BPMN/CMMN/DMN), reducing vendor lock-in
  • Free, permissively licensed core engine available for production use
  • Handles complex, long-running case management alongside standard workflows
Cons
  • No published pricing, every deployment requires a sales quote
  • Built for enterprise IT operations, overkill for a small team's automation needs
  • Legacy product lineage means the interface carries some dated conventions
  • Enterprise pricing is not published, requiring a sales conversation for cost estimates
  • Steeper learning curve than no-code automation tools aimed at business users
  • Full enterprise feature set (high availability, advanced analytics) requires the paid edition
CompanyRedwood Software, founded 2000Flowable, founded 2016

Prices come from each vendor's pricing page, last checked 20260810. Check the vendor before you buy.

FAQ

Questions people ask

Is ActiveBatch better than Flowable?

In our reviews ActiveBatch scores 4.1 and Flowable scores 4.2. The better pick depends on the job. ActiveBatch: Enterprise workload-automation platform that orchestrates job scheduling across on-prem, cloud, and hybrid systems from one console. Flowable: Open-source business process automation platform for modeling, running, and monitoring enterprise workflows.

Which is cheaper, ActiveBatch or Flowable?

ActiveBatch: see pricing. Flowable: free.

Do ActiveBatch and Flowable have free plans?

Only Flowable has a free plan.

More comparisons