List your tool

Head to head · 2026

Activeloop vs Clear.ml

Pricing, free plans, ratings, features, pros and cons, side by side. Where one comes out ahead, we mark it.

Activeloop

Database built for AI workloads that stores and streams multimodal training data, embeddings, images, video, and…

4.1$40/mo

Visit Activeloop (opens Activeloop in a new tab)

Clear.ml

Open-source MLOps platform tracking experiments, managing data, and orchestrating pipelines across the ML lifecycle

4.3$15/mo

Visit Clear.ml (opens Clear.ml in a new tab)

Who comes out ahead

Based only on the facts in our directory. The right pick still depends on the job you need done.

  • Lower starting price

    Clear.ml

    From $15/mo against from $40/mo

  • Free plan

    Tie

    Both have one

  • Higher rating

    Clear.ml

    4.1 against 4.3

  • Same job?

    Yes

    Both are AI Infrastructure & Agent Tooling tools

Side by side

Compared onActiveloopClear.ml
Our rating4.14.3Better
Starts at$40/mo$15/moBetter
Free planYesYes
CategoryAI Infrastructure & Agent ToolingAI Infrastructure & Agent Tooling
PlansFrom $40/moFrom $15/mo
Key features
  • Open-core database purpose-built for multimodal AI training data
  • Built-in dataset versioning and visualization
  • Streaming access to public and private datasets for model training
  • API access for programmatic dataset management
  • Free tier for individual researchers and small projects
  • Automatic experiment tracking (code, hyperparameters, datasets, artifacts)
  • Data versioning on top of existing object storage
  • Pipeline orchestration for MLOps and LLMOps workflows
  • Model-serving infrastructure for production deployment
  • GPU resource management via an infrastructure control plane
Pros
  • Open-source core (Deep Lake) lets teams self-host and inspect the code
  • Real enterprise customers in regulated sectors, not only startups
  • Y Combinator-backed with institutional Series A funding
  • Free, self-hostable open-source core avoids vendor lock-in entirely
  • Five-module coverage spans the full ML lifecycle instead of experiment tracking
  • Near decade of operating history and enterprise customers (NVIDIA, Samsung, Bosch) back its stability
Cons
  • Free tier's 3 queries/day and 100MB storage cap suit only small experiments
  • Pro plan's per-user, per-overage pricing can get higher-priced at scale
  • Narrower use case than general-purpose vector databases, so a smaller ecosystem of integrations
  • Five-module breadth means a learning curve to use the platform to its full extent
  • Self-hosting the open-source version requires infrastructure and DevOps effort a hosted competitor wouldn't
  • Enterprise and Scale tier pricing isn't published, requiring a sales conversation
CompanyActiveloop, founded 2018ClearML, founded 2016

Prices come from each vendor's pricing page, last checked 20260810. Check the vendor before you buy.

FAQ

Questions people ask

Is Activeloop better than Clear.ml?

In our reviews Activeloop scores 4.1 and Clear.ml scores 4.3. The better pick depends on the job. Activeloop: Database built for AI workloads that stores and streams multimodal training data, embeddings, images, video, and text, at scale. Clear.ml: Open-source MLOps platform tracking experiments, managing data, and orchestrating pipelines across the ML lifecycle.

Which is cheaper, Activeloop or Clear.ml?

Clear.ml has the lower starting price: from $40/mo for Activeloop and from $15/mo for Clear.ml.

Do Activeloop and Clear.ml have free plans?

Yes, both have a free plan.

More comparisons

Activeloop compared with

All Activeloop alternatives

Clear.ml compared with

All Clear.ml alternatives