List your tool

Head to head · 2026

Bito vs Sourcegraph Amp

Pricing, free plans, ratings, features, pros and cons, side by side. Where one comes out ahead, we mark it.

Bito

A context layer that plugs into the coding tools you already use

4.2$15/mo

Visit Bito (opens Bito in a new tab)

Sourcegraph Amp

An agentic coding tool built on a decade of enterprise code search

4.3$10/mo

Visit Sourcegraph Amp (opens Sourcegraph Amp in a new tab)

Who comes out ahead

Based only on the facts in our directory. The right pick still depends on the job you need done.

  • Lower starting price

    Sourcegraph Amp

    From $10/mo against from $15/mo

  • Free plan

    Tie

    Neither has one

  • Higher rating

    Sourcegraph Amp

    4.2 against 4.3

  • Same job?

    Yes

    Both are Coding tools

Side by side

Compared onBitoSourcegraph Amp
Our rating4.24.3Better
Starts at$15/mo$10/moBetter
Free planNoNo
CategoryCodingCoding
PlansFrom $15/moFrom $10/mo
Key features
  • Knowledge graph built from repos, commits, issues, and docs
  • Integrates directly into existing tools like Cursor, Claude Code, and GitHub
  • Cross-repository impact analysis for code reviews
  • Epic-to-story technical scoping using real system context
  • Reported improvements in task success rate and token cost
  • Built on Sourcegraph's decade-old enterprise code search infrastructure
  • Agentic coding capabilities layered onto proven context technology
  • Designed for genuinely large-scale, multi-repository codebases
  • No free tier
  • Enterprise-grade code search heritage since 2013
Pros
  • Extends existing coding tools rather than requiring a switch away from them
  • System-wide architectural context goes beyond single-file awareness
  • Cross-repository review analysis catches issues isolated reviews miss
  • Built on scale-tested code search infrastructure, not a newer unproven approach
  • Suited to genuinely large, multi-repository enterprise codebases
  • Backed by a company with a decade of enterprise code intelligence experience
Cons
  • No free tier to test before committing
  • Value depends on already using compatible tools it integrates with
  • Less useful as a standalone tool without that broader integration
  • No free tier to test before committing
  • Full value depends on codebase scale large enough to benefit from that heritage
  • Newer product relative to Sourcegraph's much longer-established core search business
CompanyBito, founded 2021Sourcegraph, founded 2025

Prices come from each vendor's pricing page, last checked 20260629. Check the vendor before you buy.

FAQ

Questions people ask

Is Bito better than Sourcegraph Amp?

In our reviews Bito scores 4.2 and Sourcegraph Amp scores 4.3. The better pick depends on the job. Bito: A context layer that plugs into the coding tools you already use. Sourcegraph Amp: An agentic coding tool built on a decade of enterprise code search.

Which is cheaper, Bito or Sourcegraph Amp?

Sourcegraph Amp has the lower starting price: from $15/mo for Bito and from $10/mo for Sourcegraph Amp.

Do Bito and Sourcegraph Amp have free plans?

Neither lists a free plan.

More comparisons