Shortlist by what you need
Start here if you know why you are leaving Sourcegraph Amp.
Want the closest match?
Sourcegraph CodyMost similar to Sourcegraph Amp in what it does, its category and its price.
Visit (opens Sourcegraph Cody in a new tab)Need a free plan?
Amazon Q DeveloperHas a free plan, rated 4.4 out of 5. Sourcegraph Amp has none.
Visit (opens Amazon Q Developer in a new tab)Want the best rated?
CodegenRated 5.0 out of 5 in our review, against 4.3 for Sourcegraph Amp.
Visit (opens Codegen in a new tab)
At a glance
Green means better than Sourcegraph Amp, red means worse. Prices are starting prices per month.
| Tool | Our rating | Starts at | Free plan | Best for | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 Sourcegraph AmpBaseline | 4.3 | $10/mo | No | An agentic coding tool built on a decade of enterprise code search | |
| Sourcegraph Cody | 4.2−0.1 | Not listed | No | Sourcegraph's established chat-and-autocomplete assistant, not its newer agent | vs Sourcegraph Amp |
 Augment Code | 4.3Same | $20/mo$10 more | YesSourcegraph Amp has none | Built around indexing an entire large enterprise codebase | vs Sourcegraph Amp |
 Greptile | 4.3Same | $30/mo$20 more | No | A custom-built code graph engine for reviewing large monorepos | vs Sourcegraph Amp |
 Zencoder | 4.2−0.1 | Free | YesSourcegraph Amp has none | Routes different tasks to whichever frontier model handles them best | vs Sourcegraph Amp |
| Amazon Q Developer | 4.4+0.1 | $19/mo$9 more | YesSourcegraph Amp has none | AWS's assistant, built around AWS-specific code and infrastructure | vs Sourcegraph Amp |
| Codegen | 5.0+0.7 | $40/mo$30 more | No | Automates large-scale migrations and PRs, not interactive coding | vs Sourcegraph Amp |
 Bito | 4.2−0.1 | $15/mo$5 more | No | A context layer that plugs into the coding tools you already use | vs Sourcegraph Amp |
 Dosu | 4.3Same | $20/mo$10 more | YesSourcegraph Amp has none | AI teammate that lives inside a GitHub repository to triage issues, answer questions, and keep documentation current as code changes. | vs Sourcegraph Amp |
The alternatives in detail
In order of how closely each one matches Sourcegraph Amp.
Sourcegraph Cody
4.2Not listed
vs Sourcegraph Amp−0.1
Sourcegraph's established chat-and-autocomplete assistant, not its newer agent.
- Chat and code completion grounded in Sourcegraph's code search
- Distinct from Sourcegraph's newer, more autonomous Amp product
- Understanding spans an entire repository or organization's codebase
Grounded in genuinely mature, enterprise-tested code search technology
No free tier to test before committing
Augment Code
4.3$20/mo
vs Sourcegraph Amp$10 moreSameFree plan
Built around indexing an entire large enterprise codebase.
- Context engine indexing an entire large codebase
- Integrates into existing IDEs rather than requiring a switch
- Built for large-scale enterprise engineering teams
Full-codebase context suits genuinely large, complex engineering projects
No free tier to test before committing
Greptile
4.3$30/mo
vs Sourcegraph Amp$20 moreSame
A custom-built code graph engine for reviewing large monorepos.
- Custom-built code graph engine for large codebases
- AI pull request review with cross-repository context
- API access for building custom review workflows
Custom indexing engine targets large monorepo scale specifically
No free tier to test before committing
Zencoder
4.2Free
vs Sourcegraph Amp−0.1Free plan
Routes different tasks to whichever frontier model handles them best.
- Routes different task types to different frontier models
- Three connected products: Zenflow Code, Zenflow Work, and IDE Agents
- Multi-repository codebase indexing for architectural context
Multi-model routing avoids relying on a single provider's weaknesses
Pricing isn't transparent without direct engagement
Amazon Q Developer
4.4$19/mo
vs Sourcegraph Amp$9 more+0.1Free plan
AWS's assistant, built around AWS-specific code and infrastructure.
- Deep understanding of AWS services and infrastructure code
- Built-in security vulnerability scanning
- Automated large-scale code transformations (like Java upgrades)
Genuine depth on AWS-specific code and services
AWS-specific strength matters less for teams on other cloud providers
Codegen
5.0$40/mo
vs Sourcegraph Amp$30 more+0.7
Automates large-scale migrations and PRs, not interactive coding.
- Automated large-scale codebase migrations and refactors
- API-first, programmatic task automation
- Autonomous pull request generation
Well suited to tedious, large-scale migrations most developers want automated
No free tier, a real commitment before testing thoroughly
Bito
4.2$15/mo
vs Sourcegraph Amp$5 more−0.1
A context layer that plugs into the coding tools you already use.
- Knowledge graph built from repos, commits, issues, and docs
- Integrates directly into existing tools like Cursor, Claude Code, and GitHub
- Cross-repository impact analysis for code reviews
Extends existing coding tools rather than requiring a switch away from them
No free tier to test before committing
Dosu
4.3$20/mo
vs Sourcegraph Amp$10 moreSameFree plan
AI teammate that lives inside a GitHub repository to triage issues, answer questions, and keep documentation current as code changes.
- Automated GitHub/GitLab issue triage and responses
- Living documentation that updates as code changes
- Dosu MCP Server for coding-agent context
Free tier genuinely usable for open-source maintainers
Full value depends on a repository with meaningful activity volume
FAQ
Questions people ask
Is Sourcegraph Amp free?
Sourcegraph Amp does not list a free plan. Paid plans start from $10/mo.
What is the best free alternative to Sourcegraph Amp?
Amazon Q Developer is the highest-rated alternative here with a free plan (4.4 out of 5). Other free options: Augment Code, Dosu, Zencoder.
What is the cheapest alternative to Sourcegraph Amp?
Among paid plans, Bito has the lowest starting price (from $15/mo). If you need it free, start with Amazon Q Developer.
How did you pick these alternatives?
We match tools on what they do, their category and their price, using the details in our directory. Ratings come from our reviews and reader reviews.