List your tool

Head to head · 2026

Limbic vs OpenEvidence

Pricing, free plans, ratings, features, pros and cons, side by side. Where one comes out ahead, we mark it.

Limbic

Clinical AI for mental health providers, with published evidence behind it

4.2Not listed

Visit Limbic (opens Limbic in a new tab)

OpenEvidence

Used by 40% of US physicians, doubling its valuation to $12B in under a year

4.4Free

Visit OpenEvidence (opens OpenEvidence in a new tab)

Who comes out ahead

Based only on the facts in our directory. The right pick still depends on the job you need done.

  • Lower starting price

    Not comparable

    Not comparable: Limbic does not list a price

  • Free plan

    OpenEvidence

    Only OpenEvidence has one

  • Higher rating

    OpenEvidence

    4.2 against 4.4

  • Same job?

    Yes

    Both are Healthcare AI tools

Side by side

Compared onLimbicOpenEvidence
Our rating4.24.4Better
Starts atNot listedFree
Free planNoYesBetter
CategoryHealthcare AIHealthcare AI
PlansSee pricingFree
Key features
  • Clinical assessment support
  • Built for providers and health plans
  • Peer-reviewed evidence published in Nature Medicine
  • Access and triage at scale
  • Clinician retained in the pathway
  • Point-of-care clinical answers grounded in peer-reviewed literature with citations
  • 760,000 registered US physicians, roughly 40% of all US doctors
  • Approximately 18 million clinical consultations handled monthly
  • Free for verified physicians, monetized through pharmaceutical advertising
  • $12B valuation after a $250M Series D in January 2026
Pros
  • Carries published clinical evidence rather than testimonials
  • Sold into clinical settings with a clinician in the loop
  • Aimed at the access problem services actually face
  • Free access for physicians removes cost as a barrier to point-of-care use
  • Citations grounded in peer-reviewed literature build clinical trust
  • Extraordinarily fast physician adoption validates genuine day-to-day utility
Cons
  • Pricing is not published and there is no individual route in
  • Clinical deployment brings information governance work
  • Evidence for one use does not transfer to every setting
  • Monetized through pharmaceutical advertising, which some clinicians may view with caution
  • Built for point-of-care physician use, not a full clinical documentation platform
  • Extremely fast valuation growth invites scrutiny over long-term sustainability
CompanyLimbicOpenEvidence, founded 2022

Prices come from each vendor's pricing page, last checked 20260813. Check the vendor before you buy.

FAQ

Questions people ask

Is Limbic better than OpenEvidence?

In our reviews Limbic scores 4.2 and OpenEvidence scores 4.4. The better pick depends on the job. Limbic: Clinical AI for mental health providers, with published evidence behind it. OpenEvidence: Used by 40% of US physicians, doubling its valuation to $12B in under a year.

Which is cheaper, Limbic or OpenEvidence?

Limbic: see pricing. OpenEvidence: free.

Do Limbic and OpenEvidence have free plans?

Only OpenEvidence has a free plan.

More comparisons