List your tool

Head to head · 2026

Neo4j vs Qdrant

Pricing, free plans, ratings, features, pros and cons, side by side. Where one comes out ahead, we mark it.

Neo4j

Graph database and knowledge-graph platform positioned as a knowledge layer for AI, with GraphRAG for grounded…

4.5Free

Visit Neo4j (opens Neo4j in a new tab)

Qdrant

Open-source vector database that raised a $50M Series B to power retrieval for AI agents

4.3Free

Visit Qdrant (opens Qdrant in a new tab)

Who comes out ahead

Based only on the facts in our directory. The right pick still depends on the job you need done.

  • Lower starting price

    Not comparable

    Not comparable: Neo4j does not list a price

  • Free plan

    Tie

    Both have one

  • Higher rating

    Neo4j

    4.5 against 4.3

  • Same job?

    Yes

    Both are AI Infrastructure & Agent Tooling tools

Side by side

Compared onNeo4jQdrant
Our rating4.5Better4.3
Starts atFreeFree
Free planYesYes
CategoryAI Infrastructure & Agent ToolingAI Infrastructure & Agent Tooling
PlansFreeFree
Key features
  • GraphRAG for grounding LLM answers in a knowledge graph
  • Aura Agent for building context-aware agents
  • Vector search alongside graph queries
  • Model Context Protocol server and AI framework integrations
  • Managed AuraDB on AWS, Azure and Google Cloud
  • Open-source vector database, free to self-host with full source access
  • Qdrant Cloud managed service with a free tier and usage-based paid plans
  • Purpose-built for semantic search, recommendations, and RAG pipelines
  • $50M Series B raised March 2026 to expand agent-retrieval infrastructure
  • Filterable vector search with payload metadata alongside embeddings
Pros
  • Free AuraDB tier with no credit card
  • Relationships make AI answers traceable to source data
  • Runs managed or self-hosted
  • Open-source option gives full control and zero licensing cost for self-hosted deployments
  • Managed cloud tier removes the operational overhead of running vector search infrastructure
  • Free tier on Qdrant Cloud is generous enough for real prototyping, not just a demo
Cons
  • Hourly per-GB pricing needs monitoring
  • Graph modeling and the Cypher query language take time to learn
  • Accuracy and ROI figures are the vendor's own
  • Self-hosting still requires infrastructure expertise the managed tier is meant to remove
  • Competes in a crowded vector-database field against Pinecone and several open-source alternatives
  • Newer funding means less operating history than some competing vector databases
CompanyNeo4jQdrant, founded 2021

Prices come from each vendor's pricing page, last checked 20261012. Check the vendor before you buy.

FAQ

Questions people ask

Is Neo4j better than Qdrant?

In our reviews Neo4j scores 4.5 and Qdrant scores 4.3. The better pick depends on the job. Neo4j: Graph database and knowledge-graph platform positioned as a knowledge layer for AI, with GraphRAG for grounded LLM answers, Aura Agent for building context-aware agents, vector search and MCP support. Qdrant: Open-source vector database that raised a $50M Series B to power retrieval for AI agents.

Which is cheaper, Neo4j or Qdrant?

Neo4j: free. Qdrant: free.

Do Neo4j and Qdrant have free plans?

Yes, both have a free plan.

More comparisons