Shortlist by what you need
Start here if you know why you are leaving Kobiton.
Want the closest match?
Roost.aiMost similar to Kobiton in what it does, its category and its price.
Visit (opens Roost.ai in a new tab)Want the lowest price?
ApplitoolsFrom $667/mo, the lowest starting price here.
Visit (opens Applitools in a new tab)Want the best rated?
QA.techRated 4.1 out of 5 in our review, against 3.9 for Kobiton.
Visit (opens QA.tech in a new tab)
At a glance
Green means better than Kobiton, red means worse. Prices are starting prices per month.
| Tool | Our rating | Starts at | Free plan | Best for | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 KobitonBaseline | 3.9 | Not listed | No | Mobile app testing on real devices, with a device cloud, AI-augmented testing, no-code validations and DevOps pipeline integration. | |
| Roost.ai | 3.6−0.3 | Not listed | No | Generates unit, API and UI test cases, and spins up ephemeral preview environments to run them in. | vs Kobiton |
 QualGent | 3.9Same | Not listed | No | Agentic mobile QA that replaces flaky test suites with deterministic autonomous testing. | vs Kobiton |
 Temboo | 3.6−0.3 | Not listed | No | An AI agent for embedded development that runs inside your IDE and understands your specific hardware and SDK. | vs Kobiton |
 Virtuoso QA | 3.9Same | Not listed | No | AI-native test automation platform with natural-language authoring, self-healing tests and human-approved AI test generation. | vs Kobiton |
| Applitools | 4.1+0.2 | $667/mo | No | AI-augmented testing platform built around Visual AI, which validates what users actually see, and Autonomous, which creates and runs tests through AI-assisted recording and natural-language authoring. | vs Kobiton |
 Katalon | 3.8−0.1 | Not listed | No | Six named AI agents span the testing lifecycle - from a Requirement Analyzer that flags ambiguities to a Root Cause Analyzer that recommends fixes, on "One Agentic Platform." | vs Kobiton |
 RelicX | 3.8−0.1 | Not listed | No | Intent-based end-to-end test automation that stays maintainable as the app changes. | vs Kobiton |
| QA.tech | 4.1+0.2 | Not listed | No | Testing agents that read the screen like a user, so no selectors to maintain. | vs Kobiton |
The alternatives in detail
In order of how closely each one matches Kobiton.
Roost.ai
3.6Not listed
vs Kobiton−0.3
Generates unit, API and UI test cases, and spins up ephemeral preview environments to run them in.
- Test case generation via RoostGPT
- Unit, API and functional UI test coverage
- LLM application testing
Environments plus generation removes the constraint that stalls testing work
Generated tests cover inferred paths, not the edge cases that break production
QualGent
3.9Not listed
vs KobitonSame
Agentic mobile QA that replaces flaky test suites with deterministic autonomous testing.
- Autonomous testing agents that exercise mobile apps without scripted steps
- Deterministic execution aimed at eliminating flaky test failures
- Closed-loop coverage spanning development and production
Targets flakiness directly, the main reason mobile suites get ignored
No published pricing, so cost requires a sales conversation
Temboo
3.6Not listed
vs Kobiton−0.3
An AI agent for embedded development that runs inside your IDE and understands your specific hardware and SDK.
- AI agent specialised for embedded development
- Runs inside your existing IDE
- Understands your specific hardware and SDK
Hardware and SDK awareness is where general coding assistants fail badly
No public pricing
Virtuoso QA
3.9Not listed
vs KobitonSame
AI-native test automation platform with natural-language authoring, self-healing tests and human-approved AI test generation.
- Natural-language test authoring with a generator that turns specs into tests
- Self-healing tests that adapt to application changes
- UI, API, cross-browser and cross-device testing
Named enterprise and public-sector customers and an analyst placement, per the site
No published prices and no self-serve trial found
Applitools
4.1$667/mo
vs Kobiton+0.2
AI-augmented testing platform built around Visual AI, which validates what users actually see, and Autonomous, which creates and runs tests through AI-assisted recording and natural-language authoring.
- Visual AI for validating how an application looks
- Autonomous test creation with AI-augmented recording
- Natural-language test authoring
Free trial before committing to the Starter plan
Starter plan costs $667 a month, high for small teams
Katalon
3.8Not listed
vs Kobiton−0.1
Six named AI agents span the testing lifecycle - from a Requirement Analyzer that flags ambiguities to a Root Cause Analyzer that recommends fixes, on "One Agentic Platform.".
- Six named AI agents spanning the full testing lifecycle
- Autonomous Test Runner - executes natural-language manual tests
- Root Cause Analyzer - identifies failure causes and recommends fixes
Autonomous Test Runner lets non-automation testers run tests from plain descriptions
Pricing beyond the trial requires a demo request
RelicX
3.8Not listed
vs Kobiton−0.1
Intent-based end-to-end test automation that stays maintainable as the app changes.
- Tests generated from stated intent rather than recorded steps
- Resilient to interface changes that break selector-based tests
- End-to-end coverage across user journeys
Attacks maintenance, the real reason E2E suites get abandoned
Generated tests need review to confirm they verify the right thing
QA.tech
4.1Not listed
vs Kobiton+0.2
Testing agents that read the screen like a user, so no selectors to maintain.
- Autonomous agents testing without selectors or code access
- Test creation by chat in plain English
- GitHub PR integration with automated review
Nothing brittle to break when the interface changes
No pricing published on any tier
FAQ
Questions people ask
Is Kobiton free?
Kobiton does not list a free plan. Check its pricing page for current plans.
What is the cheapest alternative to Kobiton?
Among paid plans, Applitools has the lowest starting price (from $667/mo).
How did you pick these alternatives?
We match tools on what they do, their category and their price, using the details in our directory. Ratings come from our reviews and reader reviews.