Shortlist by what you need
Start here if you know why you are leaving Owlity.
Want the closest match?
KatalonMost similar to Owlity in what it does, its category and its price.
Visit (opens Katalon in a new tab)Need a free plan?
TestsigmaHas a free plan, rated 4.0 out of 5. Owlity has none.
Visit (opens Testsigma in a new tab)Want the lowest price?
FumeFrom $500/mo, the lowest starting price here.
Visit (opens Fume in a new tab)Want the best rated?
QA.techRated 4.1 out of 5 in our review, against 4.0 for Owlity.
Visit (opens QA.tech in a new tab)
At a glance
Green means better than Owlity, red means worse. Prices are starting prices per month.
| Tool | Our rating | Starts at | Free plan | Best for | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 OwlityBaseline | 4.0 | Not listed | No | Click through the app and it writes the test, then runs the suite on every commit. | |
| Katalon | 3.8−0.2 | Not listed | No | Six named AI agents span the testing lifecycle - from a Requirement Analyzer that flags ambiguities to a Root Cause Analyzer that recommends fixes, on "One Agentic Platform." | vs Owlity |
 Virtuoso QA | 3.9−0.1 | Not listed | No | AI-native test automation platform with natural-language authoring, self-healing tests and human-approved AI test generation. | vs Owlity |
 MuukTest | 3.8−0.2 | Not listed | No | Builds and maintains an automated test suite toward high coverage as a managed service. | vs Owlity |
 RelicX | 3.8−0.2 | Not listed | No | Intent-based end-to-end test automation that stays maintainable as the app changes. | vs Owlity |
| Fume | 3.9−0.1 | $500/mo | No | AI QA agent that turns screen recordings into maintained Playwright test suites. | vs Owlity |
| QA.tech | 4.1+0.1 | Not listed | No | Testing agents that read the screen like a user, so no selectors to maintain. | vs Owlity |
 QualGent | 3.9−0.1 | Not listed | No | Agentic mobile QA that replaces flaky test suites with deterministic autonomous testing. | vs Owlity |
| Testsigma | 4.0Same | Free | YesOwlity has none | Agentic test automation that generates, runs, heals and diagnoses tests | vs Owlity |
The alternatives in detail
In order of how closely each one matches Owlity.
Katalon
3.8Not listed
vs Owlity−0.2
Six named AI agents span the testing lifecycle - from a Requirement Analyzer that flags ambiguities to a Root Cause Analyzer that recommends fixes, on "One Agentic Platform.".
- Six named AI agents spanning the full testing lifecycle
- Autonomous Test Runner - executes natural-language manual tests
- Root Cause Analyzer - identifies failure causes and recommends fixes
Autonomous Test Runner lets non-automation testers run tests from plain descriptions
Pricing beyond the trial requires a demo request
Virtuoso QA
3.9Not listed
vs Owlity−0.1
AI-native test automation platform with natural-language authoring, self-healing tests and human-approved AI test generation.
- Natural-language test authoring with a generator that turns specs into tests
- Self-healing tests that adapt to application changes
- UI, API, cross-browser and cross-device testing
Named enterprise and public-sector customers and an analyst placement, per the site
No published prices and no self-serve trial found
MuukTest
3.8Not listed
vs Owlity−0.2
Builds and maintains an automated test suite toward high coverage as a managed service.
- Test suite built on your behalf
- Ongoing maintenance of the suite
- Coverage-oriented approach
Takes on the work that always loses to feature delivery
Pricing renders client-side and cannot be compared upfront
RelicX
3.8Not listed
vs Owlity−0.2
Intent-based end-to-end test automation that stays maintainable as the app changes.
- Tests generated from stated intent rather than recorded steps
- Resilient to interface changes that break selector-based tests
- End-to-end coverage across user journeys
Attacks maintenance, the real reason E2E suites get abandoned
Generated tests need review to confirm they verify the right thing
Fume
3.9$500/mo
vs Owlity−0.1
AI QA agent that turns screen recordings into maintained Playwright test suites.
- Screen-recording-to-Playwright-test generation
- Automated twice-daily test runs with failure notifications
- AI fallback agent that repairs broken tests when UI changes
Converts a screen recording into a working test without writing test code by hand
$500/month starting price puts it out of reach for solo developers and small teams
QA.tech
4.1Not listed
vs Owlity+0.1
Testing agents that read the screen like a user, so no selectors to maintain.
- Autonomous agents testing without selectors or code access
- Test creation by chat in plain English
- GitHub PR integration with automated review
Nothing brittle to break when the interface changes
No pricing published on any tier
QualGent
3.9Not listed
vs Owlity−0.1
Agentic mobile QA that replaces flaky test suites with deterministic autonomous testing.
- Autonomous testing agents that exercise mobile apps without scripted steps
- Deterministic execution aimed at eliminating flaky test failures
- Closed-loop coverage spanning development and production
Targets flakiness directly, the main reason mobile suites get ignored
No published pricing, so cost requires a sales conversation
Testsigma
4.0Free
vs OwlitySameFree plan
Agentic test automation that generates, runs, heals and diagnoses tests.
- Test generation from written requirements
- Self-healing tests when the interface changes
- Automated failure diagnosis
Self-healing addresses the maintenance load that kills test suites
Generated tests need review against real acceptance criteria
FAQ
Questions people ask
Is Owlity free?
Owlity does not list a free plan. Check its pricing page for current plans.
What is the best free alternative to Owlity?
Testsigma is the highest-rated alternative here with a free plan (4.0 out of 5).
What is the cheapest alternative to Owlity?
Among paid plans, Fume has the lowest starting price (from $500/mo). If you need it free, start with Testsigma.
How did you pick these alternatives?
We match tools on what they do, their category and their price, using the details in our directory. Ratings come from our reviews and reader reviews.