Shortlist by what you need
Start here if you know why you are leaving RelicX.
Want the closest match?
QA.techMost similar to RelicX in what it does, its category and its price.
Visit (opens QA.tech in a new tab)Need a free plan?
TestsigmaHas a free plan, rated 4.0 out of 5. RelicX has none.
Visit (opens Testsigma in a new tab)Want the lowest price?
BugsterFrom $20/mo, the lowest starting price here.
Visit (opens Bugster in a new tab)Want the best rated?
PieRated 4.1 out of 5 in our review, against 3.8 for RelicX.
Visit (opens Pie in a new tab)
At a glance
Green means better than RelicX, red means worse. Prices are starting prices per month.
| Tool | Our rating | Starts at | Free plan | Best for | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.8 | Not listed | No | Intent-based end-to-end test automation that stays maintainable as the app changes. | ||
| 4.1+0.3 | Not listed | No | Testing agents that read the screen like a user, so no selectors to maintain. | vs RelicX | |
| 3.9+0.1 | Not listed | No | Agentic process automation using language models and computer vision to work through existing interfaces. | vs RelicX | |
| 4.0+0.2 | Free | YesRelicX has none | Agentic test automation that generates, runs, heals and diagnoses tests | vs RelicX | |
| 3.9+0.1 | $20/mo | YesRelicX has none | Watches user flows in a live application and regenerates end-to-end tests automatically when the UI changes. | vs RelicX | |
| 4.0+0.2 | Not listed | No | Click through the app and it writes the test, then runs the suite on every commit. | vs RelicX | |
| 4.1+0.3 | Not listed | No | Reads your pull request, tests the app like a user would, and opens a PR with the fix. | vs RelicX | |
| 4.0+0.2 | Not listed | No | AI-powered test automation platform from Tricentis that creates tests from natural-language descriptions, uses AI locators to find elements and self-heals tests as an app changes. | vs RelicX | |
| 3.6−0.2 | Not listed | No | End-to-end engineering task automation - takes a feature request, bug description or stack trace and returns code tested against your own suite. | vs RelicX |
The alternatives in detail
In order of how closely each one matches RelicX.

QA.tech
4.1Not listed
vs RelicX+0.3
Testing agents that read the screen like a user, so no selectors to maintain.
- Autonomous agents testing without selectors or code access
- Test creation by chat in plain English
- GitHub PR integration with automated review
Nothing brittle to break when the interface changes
No pricing published on any tier

SOLA
3.9Not listed
vs RelicX+0.1
Agentic process automation using language models and computer vision to work through existing interfaces.
- Computer vision and language models to operate software through its interface
- Automates data entry, scraping and document processing flows
- Works with legacy systems that expose no API
Reaches systems that offer no API and cannot otherwise be automated
Slower and less deterministic than a direct API integration

Testsigma
4.0Free
vs RelicX+0.2Free plan
Agentic test automation that generates, runs, heals and diagnoses tests.
- Test generation from written requirements
- Self-healing tests when the interface changes
- Automated failure diagnosis
Self-healing addresses the maintenance load that kills test suites
Generated tests need review against real acceptance criteria

Bugster
3.9$20/mo
vs RelicX+0.1Free plan
Watches user flows in a live application and regenerates end-to-end tests automatically when the UI changes.
- Automatic end-to-end test generation from captured user flows
- Self-adapting tests when the UI changes
- Real-browser test execution on every pull request
Free tier (100 test runs/month) makes it accessible to solo developers and small teams
Founded in 2023, so its long-term reliability across large, complex codebases is less proven than established QA vendors

Owlity
4.0Not listed
vs RelicX+0.2
Click through the app and it writes the test, then runs the suite on every commit.
- Owlity Eye desktop recorder turning click-throughs into tests
- Owlity Wing running the suite in parallel on every commit
- Owlity Mind coverage and root-cause dashboard
Recording removes the afternoon that stops teams starting
No pricing figures published

Pie
4.1Not listed
vs RelicX+0.3
Reads your pull request, tests the app like a user would, and opens a PR with the fix.
- Reads pull requests and tests the changed code
- Opens fix PRs instead of filing tickets
- Self-healing tests that survive UI redesigns
Self-healing avoids the maintenance cost that kills test suites
Pricing is only quoted after a scan of your app

Testim
4.0Not listed
vs RelicX+0.2
AI-powered test automation platform from Tricentis that creates tests from natural-language descriptions, uses AI locators to find elements and self-heals tests as an app changes.
- AI creation of tests from natural-language descriptions
- Custom locators built with AI and machine learning
- Self-healing tests that adapt as the app changes
Self-healing reduces test maintenance when the interface changes
No published prices, and third parties describe sales-gated annual contracts

Morph
3.6Not listed
vs RelicX−0.2
End-to-end engineering task automation - takes a feature request, bug description or stack trace and returns code tested against your own suite.
- End-to-end engineering task automation
- Feature and change requests from a plain description
- Bug fixing from a stack trace or symptom description
Verification against your own tests makes output evaluable, not just plausible
The verification loop is only as good as your existing test coverage
FAQ
Questions people ask
Is RelicX free?
RelicX does not list a free plan. Check its pricing page for current plans.
What is the best free alternative to RelicX?
Testsigma is the highest-rated alternative here with a free plan (4.0 out of 5). Other free options: Bugster.
What is the cheapest alternative to RelicX?
Among paid plans, Bugster has the lowest starting price (from $20/mo). If you need it free, start with Testsigma.
How did you pick these alternatives?
We match tools on what they do, their category and their price, using the details in our directory. Ratings come from our reviews and reader reviews.
