Contact for Pricing

Second Me

Builds an AI version of you from your memories, then lets it talk to other people.

3.8 Chatbots
3.8 Good 3.8
Aims at holding your actual viewpoints, not generic helpfulness No pricing published anywhere on the site
Reviewed by Challenging Voice Editorial · Updated Aug 2026 How we rate
PricingContact for Pricing
Free planNo
CompanyMindverse AI
PlatformsAndroid, iOS, Web
CategoryChatbots
Last reviewedAug 2026
Ask AI about Second Me ChatGPT Claude Perplexity

Overview

Second Me is Mindverse AI’s personal avatar platform, reached now at second.me after the MindOS domain was folded into it. You define a personality, feed it your memories, notes and voice recordings, and it produces an avatar that answers as you would: with your positions and your phrasing rather than a general assistant’s. The avatar can then be distributed to an audience or monetised.

The interesting claim is not that it sounds like you but that it holds your viewpoints. A generic assistant asked a contested question gives a balanced summary; the person being imitated has an actual opinion, and an avatar without one is instantly recognisable as a bot. Whether the memory-injection approach delivers that is the whole question, and it is the part hardest to judge from outside.

It targets creators, influencers and professionals looking to scale reach beyond the hours they have, with user-managed controls over which content the avatar can draw on. There is a companion open-source project, and the product runs through login or the mobile app with no pricing published anywhere on the site. An avatar speaking as you to an audience is a reputational exposure that no privacy control covers, memory-derived opinions drift from the person’s real ones over time, and monetising a synthetic version of yourself is a disclosure question in most jurisdictions.

Key features

  • Avatar built from your memories, notes and voice
  • Three-step creation: personality, memories, distribution
  • Voice note capture for ongoing memory input
  • User-managed controls over what the avatar can access
  • Companion open-source project and mobile apps

Screenshots & demo

Second Me screenshot 1

Pricing

Second Me uses custom pricing. Contact their team for a quote based on your needs.

  • Pricing modelContact for Pricing
  • Starting priceCustom
  • Free planNo
Visit Second Me

Pricing is provided as a guide. Check the official site for the latest plans.

Pros & cons

Pros

  • Aims at holding your actual viewpoints, not generic helpfulness
  • Explicit user control over which memories are in scope
  • Open-source component alongside the hosted product

Cons

  • No pricing published anywhere on the site
  • An avatar speaking as you is reputational exposure no setting covers
  • Monetising a synthetic self raises disclosure duties in most places

How it compares

ToolRatingFreeFromBest known for
Second Me (this tool)3.8No—Avatar built from your memories, notes and voice
Chatmate AI2.9Yes$9.9/moAI companions ("mates") with simulated personalities and emotional framing
Nomi4.2Yes$16/moPersistent long-term memory across conversations
Kajiwoto3.2YesFreeTrain a personal AI companion's personality, style, and knowledge

Alternatives to Second Me

3 tools matched to Second Me on what they do, their category and their price.

Chatmate AI

2.9

AI companions with simulated personalities to chat, voice call, and generate photos with – free tier included, Premium at $9.90/month.

Freemium Chatbots

Kajiwoto

3.2

Train your own AI companion's personality and memory over time, chat solo or in multi-party Kaji Rooms – NSFW content banned outright, immediate ban, no warning.

Freemium Chatbots

Frequently asked questions

What is Second Me?
Second Me is Mindverse AI's personal avatar platform, reached now at second.me after the MindOS domain was folded into it.
Is Second Me free?
Second Me does not offer a free plan.
What are the best Second Me alternatives?
The closest matches in the directory are Chatmate AI, Nomi, and Kajiwoto, compared side by side above.

Reviews

3.8 Editorial rating No reviews yet

Write a review