List your tool

Head to head · 2026

Ayanza vs Tulsk.io

Pricing, free plans, ratings, features, pros and cons, side by side. Where one comes out ahead, we mark it.

Ayanza

Team workspace combining objectives, projects, tasks, notes, wiki, newsfeed and chat, free for up to 5…

3.8$6/mo

Visit Ayanza (opens Ayanza in a new tab)

Tulsk.io

Project management where a task can be assigned to an agent, and chat is the manager

3.9$7/mo

Visit Tulsk.io (opens Tulsk.io in a new tab)

Who comes out ahead

Based only on the facts in our directory. The right pick still depends on the job you need done.

  • Lower starting price

    Ayanza

    From $6/mo against from $7/mo

  • Free plan

    Tie

    Both have one

  • Higher rating

    Tulsk.io

    3.8 against 3.9

  • Same job?

    Yes

    Both are Productivity tools

Side by side

Compared onAyanzaTulsk.io
Our rating3.83.9Better
Starts at$6/moBetter$7/mo
Free planYesYes
CategoryProductivityProductivity
Plans
  • Free$0
  • Premium$6 per user per month
  • Ultra$15 per user per month
From $7/mo
Key features
  • Objectives, projects and tasks in one workspace
  • Notes, wiki, newsfeed and team chat included
  • AI assistance on paid tiers
  • Full-text search and templates
  • Google SSO and Microsoft login on the free plan
  • Tasks, projects and sprints with dependencies and subtasks
  • Work assignable to autonomous agents
  • Workspace Chat as an always-on project manager
  • Slack, Gmail, GitHub and Google Calendar integration
  • MCP server exposing 51-plus tools
Pros
  • Free tier is genuinely usable, including SSO that competitors paywall
  • $6 per user per month undercuts most comparable workspaces
  • Goals and execution live together instead of in separate tools
  • Agents and people share one board, so the whole plan is visible
  • MCP server rather than a closed automation layer
  • Cheap at $7 per additional user
Cons
  • Free plan caps at 5 users and 200 docs
  • AI features require upgrading from free
  • Breadth over depth - each module is lighter than a dedicated tool
  • Agent-completed work still needs review before anything depends on it
  • A chat-based manager is only as good as the context it holds
  • Two seats is a small free tier for testing a team workflow
CompanyAyanzaTulsk

Prices come from each vendor's pricing page, last checked 20260831. Check the vendor before you buy.

FAQ

Questions people ask

Is Ayanza better than Tulsk.io?

In our reviews Ayanza scores 3.8 and Tulsk.io scores 3.9. The better pick depends on the job. Ayanza: Team workspace combining objectives, projects, tasks, notes, wiki, newsfeed and chat, free for up to 5 users and $6 per user a month with AI. Tulsk.io: Project management where a task can be assigned to an agent, and chat is the manager.

Which is cheaper, Ayanza or Tulsk.io?

Ayanza has the lower starting price: from $6/mo for Ayanza and from $7/mo for Tulsk.io.

Do Ayanza and Tulsk.io have free plans?

Yes, both have a free plan.

More comparisons