Tulsk runs tasks, projects and sprints with dependencies and subtasks, but any item can be assigned to an autonomous agent rather than a person. Workspace Chat acts as the always-on project manager coordinating between them, with Slack, Gmail, GitHub and Google Calendar connected and an MCP server exposing 51-plus tools.
Assigning to an agent in the same board as a person is the right primitive. The alternative most teams live with is a project tool for the humans and a separate automation layer for the agents, so nobody can see the whole plan in one place, and the status of half the work is invisible at standup.
Free covers two seats, Pro adds users at $7 each, and enterprise is quoted. Agents completing assigned work still need review before anything downstream depends on it, a chat-based project manager is only as good as the context it holds, and a two-seat free tier is small for testing a team workflow.
Tulsk.io starts at $7, which is 30% below the Productivity median of $10 a month across the 187 priced tools we list in that category.
The cheapest paid option in Productivity starts at $0.29 and the most expensive at $165.
71% of Productivity tools in the directory offer a free tier, and this is one of them.
Compared against every priced listing in Productivity, recalculated as the catalogue changes. Method and the full market breakdown are in our AI tool pricing study.
Async Slack/Teams standups with AI-generated poll answers and automatic theme-grouping of open responses – 4.9/5 on GetApp and Capterra, now with an MCP server for AI agents.
Paste your notes and ChatGPT turns them into tasks automatically – AI suggests who should do them based on past experience, and analyzes results into performance reports.
Team workspace combining objectives, projects, tasks, notes, wiki, newsfeed and chat, free for up to 5 users and $6 per user a month with AI.
Work management at enterprise scale, from a spreadsheet grid up to portfolio dashboards.
