Greenhouse vs Humanly (2026): Pricing, Features & Which to Choose

Who comes out ahead

Based only on the facts in our directory. The right pick still depends on the job you need done.

Lower starting price
Not comparable
Not comparable: Greenhouse does not list a price
Free plan
Tie
Neither has one
Higher rating
Greenhouse
4.2 against 4.0
Same job?
Yes
Both are HR & Recruiting AI tools

Side by side

Compared on	Greenhouse	Humanly
Our rating	4.2Better	4.0
Starts at	Not listed	Not listed
Free plan	No	No
Category	HR & Recruiting AI	HR & Recruiting AI
Plans	CoreQuote only (demo) PlusQuote only (demo) ProQuote only (demo)	See pricing
Key features	Structured hiring with standardized interview kits and scorecards Built specifically to reduce bias and keep evaluation criteria consistent One of the most established ATS platforms, operating since 2012 Roughly $820M valuation on $141M-plus raised across seven rounds Pricing starts around $5,100 a year for small teams	AI Recruiter, AI Interviewer, and ATS combined in one platform Conversational AI across chat, phone, and video for candidate engagement Built specifically for high-volume hiring scenarios $25M Series B in May 2026 led by SEEK Investments, $52M raised total Outcome-based pricing options including pay-per-candidate and pay-per-hire
Pros	Structured hiring approach directly addresses bias and inconsistency in interviews Long operating history since 2012 gives proven reliability at scale Well-established integration ecosystem built over more than a decade	Combines recruiting, interviewing, and tracking rather than requiring separate tools Outcome-based pricing options align cost directly with hiring results Backed by SEEK, a company with direct recruiting-industry expertise
Cons	Enterprise Pro deployments can reach $70,000-plus a year Additional costs for implementation and sourcing automation add-ons Reported 8-15% annual price increases at renewal for existing customers	Pricing isn't published, requires a demo and custom quote Reported mid-market deployments run $15,000 to $50,000-plus annually Best suited to high-volume hiring, less differentiated for low-volume, senior roles
Company	Greenhouse Software, founded 2012	Humanly, founded 2018

Prices come from each vendor's pricing page, last checked 20260715. Check the vendor before you buy.

FAQ

Questions people ask

Is Greenhouse better than Humanly?

In our reviews Greenhouse scores 4.2 and Humanly scores 4.0. The better pick depends on the job. Greenhouse: One of the most established ATS platforms, built for structured, fair hiring since 2012. Humanly: Combines an AI Recruiter, AI Interviewer, and ATS after a $25M round focused on candidate experience.

Which is cheaper, Greenhouse or Humanly?

Greenhouse: see pricing. Humanly: see pricing.

Do Greenhouse and Humanly have free plans?

Neither lists a free plan.

More comparisons

Greenhouse compared with

All Greenhouse alternatives

Humanly compared with

All Humanly alternatives