List your tool

Head to head · 2026

Ashby vs Greenhouse

Pricing, free plans, ratings, features, pros and cons, side by side. Where one comes out ahead, we mark it.

Ashby

Applicant tracking system built with recruiting analytics baked in, not bolted on as an afterthought

4.2$270/mo

Visit Ashby (opens Ashby in a new tab)

Greenhouse

One of the most established ATS platforms, built for structured, fair hiring since 2012

4.2Not listed

Visit Greenhouse (opens Greenhouse in a new tab)

Who comes out ahead

Based only on the facts in our directory. The right pick still depends on the job you need done.

  • Lower starting price

    Not comparable

    Not comparable: Greenhouse does not list a price

  • Free plan

    Tie

    Neither has one

  • Higher rating

    Tie

    4.2 against 4.2

  • Same job?

    Yes

    Both are HR & Recruiting AI tools

Side by side

Compared onAshbyGreenhouse
Our rating4.24.2
Starts at$270/moNot listed
Free planNoNo
CategoryHR & Recruiting AIHR & Recruiting AI
Plans
  • Foundations$300/mo (1-10 employees) to $900/mo (76-100); 10% off with a yearly commitment
  • PlusQuote only (101-1,000 employees)
  • EnterpriseQuote only (1,000+ employees)
  • Ashby AnalyticsQuote only, usage-based
  • CoreQuote only (demo)
  • PlusQuote only (demo)
  • ProQuote only (demo)
Key features
  • Full applicant tracking system with job requisitions, pipelines, and interview scheduling
  • Native recruiting analytics dashboards built into the core product
  • AI-assisted candidate sourcing alongside the core ATS workflow
  • Foundations plan starting at $400/month for smaller teams
  • Custom Plus and Enterprise tiers for larger organizations
  • Structured hiring with standardized interview kits and scorecards
  • Built specifically to reduce bias and keep evaluation criteria consistent
  • One of the most established ATS platforms, operating since 2012
  • Roughly $820M valuation on $141M-plus raised across seven rounds
  • Pricing starts around $5,100 a year for small teams
Pros
  • Built-in analytics remove the need to export ATS data into a separate BI tool
  • Combines sourcing, tracking, and reporting in one connected platform
  • Structured interview scorecards support more consistent hiring decisions
  • Structured hiring approach directly addresses bias and inconsistency in interviews
  • Long operating history since 2012 gives proven reliability at scale
  • Well-established integration ecosystem built over more than a decade
Cons
  • Entry pricing at $400/month is a real commitment for very small teams
  • Enterprise tier costs require a custom quote before knowing the real price
  • Feature breadth means a longer setup and onboarding than a narrow point tool
  • Enterprise Pro deployments can reach $70,000-plus a year
  • Additional costs for implementation and sourcing automation add-ons
  • Reported 8-15% annual price increases at renewal for existing customers
CompanyAshby, founded 2018Greenhouse Software, founded 2012

Prices come from each vendor's pricing page, last checked 2026-09-24. Check the vendor before you buy.

FAQ

Questions people ask

Is Ashby better than Greenhouse?

In our reviews Ashby scores 4.2 and Greenhouse scores 4.2. The better pick depends on the job. Ashby: Applicant tracking system built with recruiting analytics baked in, not bolted on as an afterthought. Greenhouse: One of the most established ATS platforms, built for structured, fair hiring since 2012.

Which is cheaper, Ashby or Greenhouse?

Ashby: from $270/mo. Greenhouse: see pricing.

Do Ashby and Greenhouse have free plans?

Neither lists a free plan.

More comparisons