Ashby vs Workable (2026): Pricing, Features & Which to Choose

Who comes out ahead

Based only on the facts in our directory. The right pick still depends on the job you need done.

Lower starting price
Ashby
From $270/mo against from $299/mo
Free plan
Tie
Neither has one
Higher rating
Ashby
4.2 against 4.0
Same job?
Yes
Both are HR & Recruiting AI tools

Side by side

Compared on	Ashby	Workable
Our rating	4.2Better	4.0
Starts at	$270/moBetter	$299/mo
Free plan	No	No
Category	HR & Recruiting AI	HR & Recruiting AI
Plans	Foundations$300/mo (1-10 employees) to $900/mo (76-100); 10% off with a yearly commitment PlusQuote only (101-1,000 employees) EnterpriseQuote only (1,000+ employees) Ashby AnalyticsQuote only, usage-based	Standard$360/mo, or $299/mo billed yearly ($3,588/yr), for 1-20 employees Premier$599/mo billed yearly ($7,188/yr), for 1-20 employees Enterprise$719/mo billed yearly ($8,628/yr), for 1-20 employees AI Recruiting Agent3,000 free AI credits, then packs from $600 for 5,000
Key features	Full applicant tracking system with job requisitions, pipelines, and interview scheduling Native recruiting analytics dashboards built into the core product AI-assisted candidate sourcing alongside the core ATS workflow Foundations plan starting at $400/month for smaller teams Custom Plus and Enterprise tiers for larger organizations	AI-native ATS covering sourcing, screening, and hiring in one platform Priced by company headcount rather than recruiter seat count Starter plan available from about $149 a month for smaller teams Texting, video interviews, and assessments available as tier-based features Premier and Enterprise tiers bundle add-ons that cost extra on lower plans
Pros	Built-in analytics remove the need to export ATS data into a separate BI tool Combines sourcing, tracking, and reporting in one connected platform Structured interview scorecards support more consistent hiring decisions	Headcount-based pricing can favor lean recruiting teams at growing companies Lower entry price point than many enterprise-focused ATS platforms Full sourcing-to-hiring feature set rather than a narrow point solution
Cons	Entry pricing at $400/month is a real commitment for very small teams Enterprise tier costs require a custom quote before knowing the real price Feature breadth means a longer setup and onboarding than a narrow point tool	Lower tiers require paying extra for texting, video interviews, and assessments separately Real total cost with add-ons can run notably higher than the base sticker price Headcount-based pricing can penalize companies with large non-hiring headcount
Company	Ashby, founded 2018	Workable, founded 2012

Prices come from each vendor's pricing page, last checked 2026-09-24. Check the vendor before you buy.

FAQ

Questions people ask

Is Ashby better than Workable?

In our reviews Ashby scores 4.2 and Workable scores 4.0. The better pick depends on the job. Ashby: Applicant tracking system built with recruiting analytics baked in, not bolted on as an afterthought. Workable: AI-native ATS priced by headcount, from $149 a month for small teams.

Which is cheaper, Ashby or Workable?

Ashby has the lower starting price: from $270/mo for Ashby and from $299/mo for Workable.

Do Ashby and Workable have free plans?

Neither lists a free plan.

More comparisons

Ashby compared with

All Ashby alternatives

Workable compared with

All Workable alternatives