Greenhouse vs Workable (2026): Pricing, Features & Which to Choose

Who comes out ahead

Based only on the facts in our directory. The right pick still depends on the job you need done.

Lower starting price
Not comparable
Not comparable: Greenhouse does not list a price
Free plan
Tie
Neither has one
Higher rating
Greenhouse
4.2 against 4.0
Same job?
Yes
Both are HR & Recruiting AI tools

Side by side

Compared on	Greenhouse	Workable
Our rating	4.2Better	4.0
Starts at	Not listed	$299/mo
Free plan	No	No
Category	HR & Recruiting AI	HR & Recruiting AI
Plans	CoreQuote only (demo) PlusQuote only (demo) ProQuote only (demo)	Standard$360/mo, or $299/mo billed yearly ($3,588/yr), for 1-20 employees Premier$599/mo billed yearly ($7,188/yr), for 1-20 employees Enterprise$719/mo billed yearly ($8,628/yr), for 1-20 employees AI Recruiting Agent3,000 free AI credits, then packs from $600 for 5,000
Key features	Structured hiring with standardized interview kits and scorecards Built specifically to reduce bias and keep evaluation criteria consistent One of the most established ATS platforms, operating since 2012 Roughly $820M valuation on $141M-plus raised across seven rounds Pricing starts around $5,100 a year for small teams	AI-native ATS covering sourcing, screening, and hiring in one platform Priced by company headcount rather than recruiter seat count Starter plan available from about $149 a month for smaller teams Texting, video interviews, and assessments available as tier-based features Premier and Enterprise tiers bundle add-ons that cost extra on lower plans
Pros	Structured hiring approach directly addresses bias and inconsistency in interviews Long operating history since 2012 gives proven reliability at scale Well-established integration ecosystem built over more than a decade	Headcount-based pricing can favor lean recruiting teams at growing companies Lower entry price point than many enterprise-focused ATS platforms Full sourcing-to-hiring feature set rather than a narrow point solution
Cons	Enterprise Pro deployments can reach $70,000-plus a year Additional costs for implementation and sourcing automation add-ons Reported 8-15% annual price increases at renewal for existing customers	Lower tiers require paying extra for texting, video interviews, and assessments separately Real total cost with add-ons can run notably higher than the base sticker price Headcount-based pricing can penalize companies with large non-hiring headcount
Company	Greenhouse Software, founded 2012	Workable, founded 2012

Prices come from each vendor's pricing page, last checked 2026-09-24. Check the vendor before you buy.

FAQ

Questions people ask

Is Greenhouse better than Workable?

In our reviews Greenhouse scores 4.2 and Workable scores 4.0. The better pick depends on the job. Greenhouse: One of the most established ATS platforms, built for structured, fair hiring since 2012. Workable: AI-native ATS priced by headcount, from $149 a month for small teams.

Which is cheaper, Greenhouse or Workable?

Greenhouse: see pricing. Workable: from $299/mo.

Do Greenhouse and Workable have free plans?

Neither lists a free plan.

More comparisons

Greenhouse compared with

All Greenhouse alternatives

Workable compared with

All Workable alternatives