Zetane is built for organisations whose real workload is documents – RFPs, tenders, contracts, technical specifications and compliance material. Rather than one chat box, it ships named workflows: a Proposal Workflow that runs an RFP response modularly, a Document Composer that drafts section by section, Deep Web Research with citations, a Template Extractor, and Zeta Chat for analysis and extraction across a document set.
Traceability is what distinguishes it from a general assistant pointed at a PDF. Extraction returns citations, and the product is positioned around auditability of AI-generated output – which is the only version of this that works in a regulated procurement process, where an unattributed answer in a tender response is a liability rather than a time saving. The modular workflow structure matters for the same reason: proposals are reviewed in sections by different people.
Pricing is per seat and steep at the top – Starter free, Standard $59 per user a month, Professional $200 per user a month, Enterprise on request. Per-seat pricing fits poorly with how proposal work is actually staffed, where a bid manager lives in the tool and eight subject-matter experts touch it twice a quarter for the same $59. The advertised ’10x faster document processing’ is a vendor figure with no methodology attached. Note also that app.zetane.com is the login-walled application; zetane.com is the product site.
