List your tool

Head to head · 2026

HireVue vs Workable

Pricing, free plans, ratings, features, pros and cons, side by side. Where one comes out ahead, we mark it.

HireVue

Validates skills through video interviews and game-based assessments, since 2004

4.2Not listed

Visit HireVue (opens HireVue in a new tab)

Workable

AI-native ATS priced by headcount, from $149 a month for small teams

4.0$299/mo

Visit Workable (opens Workable in a new tab)

Who comes out ahead

Based only on the facts in our directory. The right pick still depends on the job you need done.

  • Lower starting price

    Not comparable

    Not comparable: HireVue does not list a price

  • Free plan

    Tie

    Neither has one

  • Higher rating

    HireVue

    4.2 against 4.0

  • Same job?

    Yes

    Both are HR & Recruiting AI tools

Side by side

Compared onHireVueWorkable
Our rating4.2Better4.0
Starts atNot listed$299/mo
Free planNoNo
CategoryHR & Recruiting AIHR & Recruiting AI
Plans
  • HireVue platformQuote only
  • Standard$360/mo, or $299/mo billed yearly ($3,588/yr), for 1-20 employees
  • Premier$599/mo billed yearly ($7,188/yr), for 1-20 employees
  • Enterprise$719/mo billed yearly ($8,628/yr), for 1-20 employees
  • AI Recruiting Agent3,000 free AI credits, then packs from $600 for 5,000
Key features
  • One-way and live video interviewing with AI candidate scoring
  • Game-based assessments and coding challenges for skills validation
  • Three tiers: Essentials, Enterprise, and Enterprise Plus
  • Advanced ATS integrations at the Enterprise tier
  • One of the longest operating histories in AI-powered hiring, since 2004
  • AI-native ATS covering sourcing, screening, and hiring in one platform
  • Priced by company headcount rather than recruiter seat count
  • Starter plan available from about $149 a month for smaller teams
  • Texting, video interviews, and assessments available as tier-based features
  • Premier and Enterprise tiers bundle add-ons that cost extra on lower plans
Pros
  • Two-decade operating history, among the most established in this category
  • Skills-validated assessments go beyond resume screening and unstructured interviews
  • Enterprise Plus tier adds volume overage protection for large hiring programs
  • Headcount-based pricing can favor lean recruiting teams at growing companies
  • Lower entry price point than many enterprise-focused ATS platforms
  • Full sourcing-to-hiring feature set rather than a narrow point solution
Cons
  • Pricing isn't published, starts around $35,000 a year plus implementation fees
  • No free tier or self-serve option for smaller teams
  • AI candidate scoring is reserved for the Enterprise tier, not included in Essentials
  • Lower tiers require paying extra for texting, video interviews, and assessments separately
  • Real total cost with add-ons can run notably higher than the base sticker price
  • Headcount-based pricing can penalize companies with large non-hiring headcount
CompanyHireVue, founded 2004Workable, founded 2012

Prices come from each vendor's pricing page, last checked 2026-09-24. Check the vendor before you buy.

FAQ

Questions people ask

Is HireVue better than Workable?

In our reviews HireVue scores 4.2 and Workable scores 4.0. The better pick depends on the job. HireVue: Validates skills through video interviews and game-based assessments, since 2004. Workable: AI-native ATS priced by headcount, from $149 a month for small teams.

Which is cheaper, HireVue or Workable?

HireVue: see pricing. Workable: from $299/mo.

Do HireVue and Workable have free plans?

Neither lists a free plan.

More comparisons