List your tool

Head to head · 2026

OpenEvidence vs Tempus AI

Pricing, free plans, ratings, features, pros and cons, side by side. Where one comes out ahead, we mark it.

OpenEvidence

Used by 40% of US physicians, doubling its valuation to $12B in under a year

4.4Free

Visit OpenEvidence (opens OpenEvidence in a new tab)

Tempus AI

Publicly traded on Nasdaq, guiding to $1.6 billion in 2026 revenue

4.3Not listed

Visit Tempus AI (opens Tempus AI in a new tab)

Who comes out ahead

Based only on the facts in our directory. The right pick still depends on the job you need done.

  • Lower starting price

    Not comparable

    Not comparable: OpenEvidence does not list a price

  • Free plan

    OpenEvidence

    Only OpenEvidence has one

  • Higher rating

    OpenEvidence

    4.4 against 4.3

  • Same job?

    Yes

    Both are Healthcare AI tools

Side by side

Compared onOpenEvidenceTempus AI
Our rating4.4Better4.3
Starts atFreeNot listed
Free planYesBetterNo
CategoryHealthcare AIHealthcare AI
PlansFreeSee pricing
Key features
  • Point-of-care clinical answers grounded in peer-reviewed literature with citations
  • 760,000 registered US physicians, roughly 40% of all US doctors
  • Approximately 18 million clinical consultations handled monthly
  • Free for verified physicians, monetized through pharmaceutical advertising
  • $12B valuation after a $250M Series D in January 2026
  • Machine learning applied to genomic and clinical data for precision treatment matching
  • One of the largest connected libraries of clinical and molecular data
  • Publicly traded on Nasdaq under the ticker TEM
  • Q1 2026 revenue of $348.1M, up 36.1% year over year
  • 2026 revenue guidance raised to $1.59-$1.60 billion
Pros
  • Free access for physicians removes cost as a barrier to point-of-care use
  • Citations grounded in peer-reviewed literature build clinical trust
  • Extraordinarily fast physician adoption validates genuine day-to-day utility
  • Publicly reported financials give unusual transparency into scale and growth
  • Massive, growing data library strengthens precision-matching over time
  • Strong, consistent revenue growth across both diagnostics and data segments
Cons
  • Monetized through pharmaceutical advertising, which some clinicians may view with caution
  • Built for point-of-care physician use, not a full clinical documentation platform
  • Extremely fast valuation growth invites scrutiny over long-term sustainability
  • Pricing runs through insurance billing and enterprise agreements, not published rates
  • Built specifically for precision medicine and oncology, a narrower clinical scope
  • Best suited to institutions already positioned to act on genomic testing results
CompanyOpenEvidence, founded 2022Tempus AI, founded 2015

Prices come from each vendor's pricing page, last checked 20260715. Check the vendor before you buy.

FAQ

Questions people ask

Is OpenEvidence better than Tempus AI?

In our reviews OpenEvidence scores 4.4 and Tempus AI scores 4.3. The better pick depends on the job. OpenEvidence: Used by 40% of US physicians, doubling its valuation to $12B in under a year. Tempus AI: Publicly traded on Nasdaq, guiding to $1.6 billion in 2026 revenue.

Which is cheaper, OpenEvidence or Tempus AI?

OpenEvidence: free. Tempus AI: see pricing.

Do OpenEvidence and Tempus AI have free plans?

Only OpenEvidence has a free plan.

More comparisons