Based only on the facts in our directory. The right pick still depends on the job you need done.
Lower starting price
Juicebox
From $119/mo against from $299/mo
Free plan
Juicebox
Only Juicebox has one
Higher rating
Juicebox
4.1 against 4.0
Same job?
Yes
Both are HR & Recruiting AI tools
Side by side
Compared on
Juicebox
Workable
Our rating
4.1Better
4.0
Starts at
$119/moBetter
$299/mo
Free plan
YesBetter
No
Category
HR & Recruiting AI
HR & Recruiting AI
Plans
From $119/mo
Standard$360/mo, or $299/mo billed yearly ($3,588/yr), for 1-20 employees
Premier$599/mo billed yearly ($7,188/yr), for 1-20 employees
Enterprise$719/mo billed yearly ($8,628/yr), for 1-20 employees
AI Recruiting Agent3,000 free AI credits, then packs from $600 for 5,000
Key features
PeopleGPT: natural-language candidate search instead of boolean filters
Autonomous sourcing agents that continuously qualify candidates against open roles
Native sync with ATS platforms including Ashby and Greenhouse
Free tier available before paid plans starting around $119/month
Access to a large expert-labeled talent dataset for search accuracy
AI-native ATS covering sourcing, screening, and hiring in one platform
Priced by company headcount rather than recruiter seat count
Starter plan available from about $149 a month for smaller teams
Texting, video interviews, and assessments available as tier-based features
Premier and Enterprise tiers bundle add-ons that cost extra on lower plans
Pros
Natural-language search removes the steepest learning curve in traditional sourcing tools
Autonomous agents keep candidate pipelines filling without constant manual searching
ATS integrations avoid creating a separate silo recruiters have to check manually
Headcount-based pricing can favor lean recruiting teams at growing companies
Lower entry price point than many enterprise-focused ATS platforms
Full sourcing-to-hiring feature set rather than a narrow point solution
Cons
Full agent capabilities sit behind paid tiers, limiting the free plan's practical use
Search quality depends on how well a role's requirements are described
Newer platform with less enterprise track record than legacy sourcing tools
Lower tiers require paying extra for texting, video interviews, and assessments separately
Real total cost with add-ons can run notably higher than the base sticker price
Headcount-based pricing can penalize companies with large non-hiring headcount
Company
Juicebox, founded 2022
Workable, founded 2012
Prices come from each vendor's pricing page, last checked 20260716. Check the vendor before you buy.
FAQ
Questions people ask
Is Juicebox better than Workable?
In our reviews Juicebox scores 4.1 and Workable scores 4.0. The better pick depends on the job. Juicebox: PeopleGPT search engine lets recruiters describe a candidate in plain language instead of building boolean filters. Workable: AI-native ATS priced by headcount, from $149 a month for small teams.
Which is cheaper, Juicebox or Workable?
Juicebox has the lower starting price: from $119/mo for Juicebox and from $299/mo for Workable.
Juicebox
Workable
