List your tool

Head to head · 2026

Ashby vs Fetcher

Pricing, free plans, ratings, features, pros and cons, side by side. Where one comes out ahead, we mark it.

Ashby

Applicant tracking system built with recruiting analytics baked in, not bolted on as an afterthought

4.2$270/mo

Visit Ashby (opens Ashby in a new tab)

Fetcher

Pulls qualified candidates from a database of 500 million global profiles

4.1$99/mo

Visit Fetcher (opens Fetcher in a new tab)

Who comes out ahead

Based only on the facts in our directory. The right pick still depends on the job you need done.

  • Lower starting price

    Fetcher

    From $99/mo against from $270/mo

  • Free plan

    Tie

    Neither has one

  • Higher rating

    Ashby

    4.2 against 4.1

  • Same job?

    Yes

    Both are HR & Recruiting AI tools

Side by side

Compared onAshbyFetcher
Our rating4.2Better4.1
Starts at$270/mo$99/moBetter
Free planNoNo
CategoryHR & Recruiting AIHR & Recruiting AI
Plans
  • Foundations$300/mo (1-10 employees) to $900/mo (76-100); 10% off with a yearly commitment
  • PlusQuote only (101-1,000 employees)
  • EnterpriseQuote only (1,000+ employees)
  • Ashby AnalyticsQuote only, usage-based
  • Self-serve$115/mo
  • Growth$379/mo
  • Amplify$649/mo
Key features
  • Full applicant tracking system with job requisitions, pipelines, and interview scheduling
  • Native recruiting analytics dashboards built into the core product
  • AI-assisted candidate sourcing alongside the core ATS workflow
  • Foundations plan starting at $400/month for smaller teams
  • Custom Plus and Enterprise tiers for larger organizations
  • Sources from a proprietary database of 500 million-plus global profiles
  • Integrates directly with existing ATS and email clients
  • Optional managed sourcing where Fetcher's team runs searches directly
  • Originally launched in 2014, pivoted from professional networking to AI sourcing
  • $40M total funding including a $27M Series B
Pros
  • Built-in analytics remove the need to export ATS data into a separate BI tool
  • Combines sourcing, tracking, and reporting in one connected platform
  • Structured interview scorecards support more consistent hiring decisions
  • Large proprietary candidate database reduces manual sourcing work
  • Managed sourcing option available for harder-to-fill roles without extra headcount
  • More accessible entry pricing than several enterprise-only competitors
Cons
  • Entry pricing at $400/month is a real commitment for very small teams
  • Enterprise tier costs require a custom quote before knowing the real price
  • Feature breadth means a longer setup and onboarding than a narrow point tool
  • Managed sourcing adds meaningful cost on top of the base subscription
  • Sourcing-focused scope doesn't cover interviewing or assessment directly
  • Database breadth matters less for highly specialized or niche technical roles
CompanyAshby, founded 2018Fetcher, founded 2014

Prices come from each vendor's pricing page, last checked 20260714. Check the vendor before you buy.

FAQ

Questions people ask

Is Ashby better than Fetcher?

In our reviews Ashby scores 4.2 and Fetcher scores 4.1. The better pick depends on the job. Ashby: Applicant tracking system built with recruiting analytics baked in, not bolted on as an afterthought. Fetcher: Pulls qualified candidates from a database of 500 million global profiles.

Which is cheaper, Ashby or Fetcher?

Fetcher has the lower starting price: from $270/mo for Ashby and from $99/mo for Fetcher.

Do Ashby and Fetcher have free plans?

Neither lists a free plan.

More comparisons